179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
EggyToast
To:
Date:
Sun, 05 Jan 2003 17:40:06 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] drukqs is not a letdown by far!
Msg-Id:
<5.2.0.9.0.20030105173915.00b4e158@mail.eggytoast.com>
In-Reply-To:
<5.1.1.6.2.20030105185451.00b2f9c8@pop.gmx.net>
Mbox:
idm.0301.gz
quoted 9 lines Perhaps this is not the correct forum for such musings, but I think it's>Perhaps this is not the correct forum for such musings, but I think it's >an interesting way to look at the ever-recurring >"music-was-better-10-years-ago" lament. One problem with all of this is >of course definining what makes music good, and thus better than other >music. Most of us are not musicologists, I suspect, so it's a very >subjective business. Which lends credence to my argument, I guess: in the >absence of an objective "good" in music, any evaluation will be based on >the evaluator, and not the music, so if the evaluation changes, it's >becuase of the evaluator, not the music.
It's not entirely true -- 80's popular "new wave" music was and always will be awful. derek ------- eggytoast.com ------- coming soon: eggtastic.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org