179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
dennis
To:
Date:
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:05:05 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] drukqs is not a letdown by far!
Msg-Id:
<OE27YfAkC7PD0UBblST0000fb30@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0301.gz
Imo "ON " was his best release ever! That's the record which triggered my attention towards idm, avant-garde, electronix, braindance whatever..... I still think that often an artists' 1st period is the most interesting period I enjoy Aphex's, AE's, Squarepushers', Plaids' first records more than what they try to create now. Often it seems to me that nowadays they are trying/looking harder for weirdness instead of feeling/emotion. For instance, i really tried to enjoy Gantz Graf...listened to it quit often.... but i can't dig the stuff It's a bit too much: " See-how-we-know-our-way-in-software-music" To me, music is more than a clever and inventive way of arranging/triggering drumsounds I really don't care whether AFX's piano is modificated... i enjoy a "live" piano just as much.. maybe more!? I find it harder and harder to find records which i want to buy... only label i buy from with my eyes closed is TOYTRONIC .... but for how long? I don't mean to say releases from nowadays Suck... not at all... but records like SAW 85-92, Not for Threes, Music has the right to children, Anti ep, Anvil Vapre.... Not sure whether i will new records as much as those... hey... maybe we're spoiled! Quibuz ----- Original Message ----- From: "B Peru" <mybadelf@yahoo.com> To: "ben gill" <gillette_foamy@yahoo.com>; <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 10:41 AM Subject: Re: [idm] drukqs is not a letdown by far!
quoted 39 lines I'm assuming there are a lot of people on this list> I'm assuming there are a lot of people on this list > that got into IDM late in the game so they have a > different perspective. I think anyone who started > collecting Aphex Twin from the beginning would have > different perspective than someone who just discover > him a few years ago. Maybe I'm wrong > > If the history perspective is semi true, that might > explain the ratio? Even the most diehard old skool > idmers find it hard to stay on the list. Where the > hell is Alan Parry or Lance Mcgannon? > > --- ben gill <gillette_foamy@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Wow. One post out of about ten that says anything > > close to something I agree with. I can't believe > > how > > many people have said things like everything before > > "RDJ" is boring, and stuff about how the more recent > > output is the best...keerist. I assumed waaayyyy > > more > > people would agree with the idea that the early > > stuff > > is the foundation, called "classic" for a reason. > > Did > > all the old school IDM-listers jump ship en masse a > > few years back? > > > > Ben > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org