179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
B Peru
To:
ben gill ,
Date:
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 01:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] drukqs is not a letdown by far!
Msg-Id:
<20030105094105.54053.qmail@web9305.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:
<20030105092201.87805.qmail@web20703.mail.yahoo.com>
Mbox:
idm.0301.gz
I'm assuming there are a lot of people on this list that got into IDM late in the game so they have a different perspective. I think anyone who started collecting Aphex Twin from the beginning would have different perspective than someone who just discover him a few years ago. Maybe I'm wrong If the history perspective is semi true, that might explain the ratio? Even the most diehard old skool idmers find it hard to stay on the list. Where the hell is Alan Parry or Lance Mcgannon? --- ben gill <gillette_foamy@yahoo.com> wrote:
quoted 15 lines Wow. One post out of about ten that says anything> Wow. One post out of about ten that says anything > close to something I agree with. I can't believe > how > many people have said things like everything before > "RDJ" is boring, and stuff about how the more recent > output is the best...keerist. I assumed waaayyyy > more > people would agree with the idea that the early > stuff > is the foundation, called "classic" for a reason. > Did > all the old school IDM-listers jump ship en masse a > few years back? > > Ben
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org