179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
J.P.L'asthme Fawn
To:
Date:
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 04:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] books on glitch music
Msg-Id:
<20020909111203.24828.qmail@web21510.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:
<p05100300b9a1697396dd@[66.114.244.130]>
Mbox:
idm.0209.gz
it's a matter of taste and context and that's it, really. when i listen to music i don't try and put it into some kind of conceptual framework unless the artist is making that intention so clearly outlined that it can't be helped. and furthermore, i think that we'll find that just as contemporary classical composers (schoenberg, stravinsky, et al) had tried to take the music where their predecessors had not, and people like arvo part, john tavener, henryk gorecki, were trying to advance the music into even less frequently charted waters, very soon people will get bored with john cage and pauline oliveros and those types, and start adjusting conceptual ideas en masse (i'm not asserting that no headway has been made as to founding new concepts, i'm just saying that the dominant, landmark achievement type things)... this is primarily because i think most listeners (myself included) find cage and oliveros music extremely boring to listen to, and fail to read much into the rigorous and perhaps overly cerebral 'concepts'. this is really going somewhere, i think, let's see if it really is, yes, hmmm,,, uhh ! you have to give props where they're due, the forebears of new techniques invent the pallette with which their followers will paint their masterpieces. glitch music came around, and we'll just say that oval or someone of that ilk (maybe even paul lansky, but that's arguable) could be called the modern progenitor of that music-- he (they, then, i guess) devised certain techniques previously unknown to most listeners and so his music sounded fresh and exciting and inspired a lot of other people to think similarly about where their music ought to go, so those techniques became popularized and appeared everywhere from the smallest byline in the wire to nsync's song 'pop' and now people say they're jaded with glitch and it's over and blah blah blah when in fact it only just started a little under a decade ago and sure, the honeymoon is over but we don't a divorce yet. there's plenty of good music coming out of the glitch movement, from dntel's album (which happens to be in my top 5 out of the last ten years) to the notwist to a billion other things that would be too much trouble to get into in a post already this muddled. imagine if people had given up on the guitar so easily. the world would be less a lot of brilliant music because a few people suggested the notion that maybe you couldn't do anything else with those six strings, or that they sounded 'tired'... i think that when people get sick of sounds quickly like that it's a real sign of just exactly how fast society/development/ technology is moving. if you look at the ascendance of these things on a curve, it's really well a very slight almost unnoticable upward grade from millions of years ago to the nineteenth century with only a few exceptions/advancements, then you get to the industrial revolution and all that garbage and then you get to the latter of half of the last century and it's like, 'holy fuck! slow down, people, we're fucking vertical and we're probably gonna hit a glass ceiling really soon, you saw willy wonka, right?' uhh... hmmm..., anyway. gregory --- kurt <supine@bway.net> wrote:
quoted 23 lines I wonder if it's possible that it will ever...it's> I wonder if it's possible that it will ever...it's > an idea that had > an astonishing freshness to it a few years back. > > once the idea had been identified, it was used by a > lot of musicians, > sometimes well, sometimes not. unexpectedly, the > sounds of digital > audio fucking up became increasingly familiar, until > they no longer > represented cheeky conceptual innovation or Cage-ian > openess, but a > new status quo with a palette of sounds as familiar > and tired as any > set of pre-sets on a commercial synth. (Perhaps I > exaggerate.) > > I don't think the sounds will go away, nor do I > think it's a bad idea > to exploit accidents and so forth. but i think these > sounds and > strategies are receding as being of primary > interest.
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org