179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Esa Ruoho
To:
idm list
Date:
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 09:36:36 +0300
Subject:
Re: waffles
Msg-Id:
<CAD28JQjNYGc4VNYb+pipzODrKp+MQ_6dQNMOvQ09quRd0E03LQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<5448A129.2040803@pchome.com.tw>
Mbox:
idm-2014-10.gz
ahh, i see what you mean John - build your own tracks by artist xyz, made to-order. like a subway sandwich. "i'll have 909 claps and a 606 rimshot, and a walking acoustic bassline, hold the glitches" On 23 October 2014 09:33, John D. <johndalton@pchome.com.tw> wrote:
quoted 64 lines Might work. Maybe an artist could have an individual app.> Might work. Maybe an artist could have an individual app. > > I like my idea though. "Want some claps here? Pay just $.09!" > > nah, more like, you have an album, but to unlock extra bonus tracks, you > have to pay 0.99 EURO or so. and then they'd be inside the app. > > > On 23 October 2014 05:19, John D. <johndalton@pchome.com.tw> wrote: > >> With sounds missing, like? It could be ambient maybe unless you >> purchased the beats. >> >> there's that word "decent" right between "got" and "monetization". >> >> i wonder if an album app with in-app-purchases would make a dime >> >> --- >> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >> http://lackluster.org >> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >> iPhone: +358403703659 >> >> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:52, Esa Juhani Ruoho <esaruoho@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> so anyone think Best Fiends has got monetization or is it all an >> in-app-purchase rip-off? >> >> --- >> http://lackluster.bandcamp.com >> http://lackluster.org >> http://esaruoho.tumblr.com >> iPhone: +358403703659 >> >> On 22 Oct 2014, at 23:51, Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Be well, my friend, Jon. >> On Oct 22, 2014 3:49 PM, "Jon Sands" <fohdeesha@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 10/22/2014 3:31 PM, Jared Dunne wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Oh, the beautiful human trait of deflection. >>>> >>>> >>> Nah, I think I just speak for the majority of this list (and Zack summed >>> it up well) that nobody is really interested in wasting any more effort >>> responding to the extremely poor straw man you have repeatedly tried to >>> make. We'd rather talk about something interesting. I think the moment you >>> made the hilarious comparison of physical objects to copyright, most of the >>> people here lost interest in you. It's ok though, I'm sure you'll get some >>> poor sap here soon willing to argue with you >>> >>> -- >>> Jon Sands >>> Fohdeesha Media >>> http://fohdeesha.com/ >>> >>> >> >> >> > >