179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Thomas Millar
To:
Date:
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 16:20:03 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] Random Inquiries
Msg-Id:
<B9799C32.96F%tmillar@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To:
<20020809152130.45572.qmail@iname.com>
Mbox:
idm.0208.gz
quoted 3 lines that said, of course, I DO understand your reference to mindless music. It's> that said, of course, I DO understand your reference to mindless music. It's > just sometimes I feel that the emphasis on traditional theory is just as much > an arbitrary decision as anything else. Perharps just a bitter academic?
On the other hand, if more modern musicians knew about theory, they might realize the hidden possibilities inherent in music and not focus so much on being 'sound-alikes'. From Ives to Cage to Thaemlitz, music's most successful experimental composers and artists have been steeped in theory, which then gave them a framework to escape from. The problem isn't that laptoppers don't use chords and harmonies and progression in the standard way, it's that they don't realize that there are endless techniques of composition besides 'sounds-good-loop-it' and twiddling faders. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org