179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Jason Stickel
To:
,
Date:
Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:25:31 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] sequencers
Msg-Id:
<F5R3wNgP1f3L0zGSOpD00014e64@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0207.gz
Speaking of the MPC, a little birdy told me that there was rumor of an MPC 400 coming out - more of a workstation from what I'm told. Any truth to this? Haven't researched anything pertaining to boxes lately, but I am obviously interested (who wouldn't be, right?). Much appreciation. js
quoted 100 lines From: fooly <kingfool@optonline.net>>From: fooly <kingfool@optonline.net> >Reply-To: kingfool@optonline.net >To: idm@hyperreal.org >Subject: Re: [idm] sequencers >Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 09:13:02 -0400 (EDT) > >I've gotten impulse tracker to work with this program in windows xp. >http://www.ece.mcgill.ca/~vromas/vdmsound/ > > > Back when I used Impulse Tracker I would load up random files as samples > > and get some crazy good sounds. if Impulse Tracker would only work on XP > > I would hammer out ideas in no time. > > > > --kev/entitee > > http://www.entitee.com/dnb > > > > > > on 7/18/02 3:48 PM, Brian Redfern at bredfern@calarts.edu wrote: > > > >> Well, I don't know if anyone here uses mod trackers, but I get a lot > >> of mileage using mod trackers like Soundtracker, I use the computer > >> keyboard to sequence sample triggers and then edit them and set up > >> insanely messed up micro loops. I've got some examples up at > >> http://brianredfern.com , I get some strange rhythms that I wouldn't > >> come up with using a midi sequencer or something like protools. I do > >> use hardware and software multitracking as well, like I have the korg > >> em1, asrxpro, I mainly use them to generate loops that go into the > >> tracker software, which I use to make more loops, which I can them > >> turn into ogg vorbis files and scratch like vinyl from within > >> terminatorX. I use all linux software cause I'm not a big fan of the > >> mac/windows interfaces. The problem for most people is that you need > >> to learn some c/c++ to use linux well, but since I program for a > >> living this isn't a problem for me. > >> > >> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Thomas Millar wrote: > >> > >>> on 7/18/02 5:02 PM, Chris Dooley at DooleyC@firstcharter.com wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hey guys i am looking for another software sequencer/arranger, etc > >>>> than what i > >>>> am used to. > >>>> > >>>> Forever i used acid and logic, but i was wondering if there are > >>>> other programs > >>>> that i could use to arrange music just to try at least? > >>> > >>> I'm gonna throw in my eight nickels even though it's not a good > >>> answer. For my time and money, all the SW audio and seq apps I demo'd > >>> started to look the same. Even Reason wasn't what I was looking for. > >>> With SW I was always getting stuck right at the very beginning > >>> because there never seemed to be any spontaneity to it. I got tired > >>> of having to plan my tracks out in my head loop-by-loop, and, well, > >>> computers crash. AAAAARGGGH. We'll not discuss timing issues. > >>> > >>> If you're looking for something other than what you're used to I > >>> suggest looking into hardware production stations. Sampling seqs such > >>> as the Akai MPCs and the YAMAHA RS7000 (fanfare) (I own one) are so > >>> much more fun I don't think I could ever go back to software. Of > >>> course you can't really get a good demo in a store, but (total) > >>> prices (assuming you're intending to pay for the SW, which is > >>> probably a dumb assumption) are about the same for the features. > >>> Buying the Yamaha changed my whole perspective on music making. > >>> Unfortunately as with many 'dance/remix' workstation products it's > >>> very easy to fall into genre traps, but that's where you have to > >>> start fucking around. The RS7000 has a lot of excellent IDM beeps and > >>> FX. Put it this way, 'Geogaddi' was really boring to me because most > >>> of that kinda stuff I can cook up in about ten minutes now. See also > >>> '*-house'. I am not exaggerating. > >>> > >>> Plus, the Yamaha is less RSI inducing and easier on your eyes than > >>> any SW I've ever used. Chopping and rearranging samples is also > >>> extremely simple, in case you cared. > >>> > >>> Tom > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > > unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
_________________________________________________________________ Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org