179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
omz
To:
Date:
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 18:54:27 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] [OT] prog
Msg-Id:
<p05010400b8b5a4a83c82@[64.81.118.51]>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.SGI.4.40.0203131934310.1461446-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Mbox:
idm.0203.gz
quoted 5 lines On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, andrei wrote:>On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, andrei wrote: > >The way I tend to look at it is that there is "prog" rock and then there's >"art" or "experimental" rock. And there are quite a few bands who were >both imo. I see Can as an art rock band.
Well 'art rock,' whatever you may define that to be, would definitely fall under the umbrella of 'progressive.'
quoted 2 lines What I associate with prog is excess, technical pyrotechnics and>What I associate with prog is excess, technical pyrotechnics and >"classical" pretensions.
Well you have listened to one to many Emerson, Lake and Palmer records :) (who suck IMO) -- ^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^-^- omz beautamous loaf recordings http://www.hotweird.com/loaf/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org