179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Adam Piontek
To:
Inconvenient Dark Matter
Date:
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:39:36 -0400
Subject:
RE: [idm] copy protection (crap)
Msg-Id:
<LOEJLJGDFOBDGGLBNFJFCEJCCAAA.apiontek@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:
<B79F2328.931B%jeff@ninjatune.net>
Mbox:
idm.0108.gz
quoted 2 lines Eyes glazed over with visions of fame> Eyes glazed over with visions of fame > makes for blindness to the fine print.
Which raises an important point: fame != money People lust after fame in lieu of money, which explains another poster's comment about artists developing a following, and then making it "big" and making less money than they did when they were just peddling their music by themselves. Fame (or noteriety?) is a sexy beast... Even (or especially!) if you're a "real artist" - having an impact on a greater number of people could be more important than collectin' tha doe. re mi fa... Anyways, doesn't this discussion belong on /.? Speaking of which, here's an (slightly relevant) article I saw there a few months ago: http://www.eff.org/IP/P2P/Napster/20010227_P2P_Copyright_White_Paper.html It talks about fair use and whatnot - maybe, if yer actually interested in this issue, searching for "real" information (with footnotes and references) would suit you better than trolling for suspiscious factoids provided by biased music fans! ;) Love and kibbles, -Adam --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org