179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Clint Anderson
To:
Baptiste Bacot
Cc:
Chris Taylor , Charles Terhune , Sham Beam , Bruno Gola , IDM
Date:
Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:27:30 -0500
Subject:
Re: elseq
Msg-Id:
<CAFhVXM_5J8GB-uLTkJiHfWvfQgU+eH1KREX-+NnRA-BXy7vi+Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:
<CABAyS=8b070kG8=R==d3YJH3oSpaznJ-7er-z4zv8cFkm+TehQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mbox:
idm-2016-10.gz
funny that hundreds of years later everyone still says its ugly and yet its still used all over heh humans! Clint Anderson Systems Engineer "Freedom -- paint me a picture!" -- Burton Cummings On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Baptiste Bacot <baptiste.bacot@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 248 lines Hey Guys,> Hey Guys, > > Funny you refer to this color Clint, I just finished Black - The History > of a Color > <https://www.amazon.fr/Black-History-Color-Michel-Pastoureau/dp/069113930X> by > this french academic, Michel Pastoureau, whose work is dedicated to the > social history of colors, symbols and heraldic in the Middle Ages. This > color is literally named 'goose poop' in french (caca d'oie). He mentioned > in the book that this color was very trendy to wear in France around the > last weeks of 1751, and that it was called 'dolphin poop' (caca dauphin), > in honor of the dolphin (first born and heir to the king), despite the fact > that it was perceived as the ugliest through the Middle Ages. Funny cover > art... :) > > B. > > 2016-10-04 20:04 GMT+02:00 Clint Anderson <clinta@gmail.com>: > >> also this lol >> >> https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2016/jun/08/stylewatch- >> pantone-448c-ugliest-colour-world-opaque-couche- >> australian-smokers-fashion >> https://www.amazon.com/Tri-Repetae-Autechre/dp/B000003RHB >> >> >> Clint Anderson >> Systems Engineer >> "Freedom -- paint me a picture!" -- Burton Cummings >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Chris Taylor <christaylor415@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Gotcha. And yeah that's right on about autonomous music. >>> >>> What's interesting is how listeners perceive "generative" music as being >>> worthless/effortless (something fairly popular to say about Confeld/Draft >>> era Ae) due to the labor being hard to perceive in the music itself. >>> >>> Same thing re: live performance, a live electronic music act is best >>> when they "do" the most stuff. >>> >>> It's a very 1:1 ratio between labor and value. >>> >>> *Expand on this idea until you've reached an undergraduate thesis* >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 4, 2016, Charles Terhune <crtdot@icloud.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah, that's more like it. It's not truly autonomous. >>>> >>>> I'll have to re-read that interview. >>>> >>>> And I was kidding when I said it was BS. And I kind of agree with Ae >>>> when the talk about the autonomous aspect. The machines will never truly >>>> create their own music until they do it from beginning to end free from >>>> human influence or even human music theory. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Chris Taylor <christaylor415@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> ah I see what you mean now >>>> >>>> - they don't think that period of their music was bullshit (how I read >>>> it), they just think push against the idea that "generative music" is >>>> autonomous because it still relies on parameters designed by humans >>>> >>>> they might've talked about this in the Resident Advisor interview, at >>>> work so I can't look it up to confirm >>>> >>>> https://www.residentadvisor.net/features/2756 >>>> >>>> >>>> what do you mean when you say you think "generative music is BS"? >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Charles Terhune <crtdot@icloud.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Aaaaannd a little more here. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.autechre.info/press/grooves-10.html >>>>> >>>>> Still not finding the exact article I was thinking of. Maybe it's me >>>>> who thinks generative music is BS? :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 12:41 PM, Charles Terhune <crtdot@icloud.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There's some mention of generative music here: >>>>> >>>>> http://autechre.net.ua/en/interviews/interview16.htm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 4, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Charles Terhune <crtdot@icloud.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> In an article in The Wire around the release of Confield maybe? I >>>>> don't remember the exact date. And I may be adding word to theirs BUT the >>>>> gist of what Sean (I believe it was he) said was that the entire idea of >>>>> generative music was somewhat BS because it always had a human being at its >>>>> source setting the parameters and boundaries. Their feeling was/is that >>>>> there could never be a truly generative music until it was entirely AI >>>>> created from start to finish. >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 3, 2016, at 10:21 PM, Chris Taylor <christaylor415@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> "which even they said was bullshit mind you" >>>>> >>>>> Where did they say this about their generative work? >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 5:55 AM, Sham Beam <sham.beam@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> > yes! age of adz has some awesome stuff. >>>>>> >>>>>> I really didn't like it at first but it's slowly been winning me >>>>>> over. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/10/2016 3:36 PM, Bruno Gola wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Sham Beam <sham.beam@gmail.com >>>>>>> <mailto:sham.beam@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that totally resonates. I was listening to The Age of Adz from >>>>>>> Sufjan Stevens yesterday in the car and there were a few "fucking >>>>>>> hell, how >>>>>>> did he do that?" moments. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yes! age of adz has some awesome stuff. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/10/2016 4:30 AM, Clint Anderson wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://autechre.net.ua/en/interviews/interview10.htm >>>>>>> <http://autechre.net.ua/en/interviews/interview10.htm> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "It's about sleight of hand, where you're revealing things >>>>>>> and then >>>>>>> pulling them back. It's that sort of dynamic. But I think >>>>>>> that's Hip >>>>>>> Hop: the whole attitude of wanting to do people's heads in a >>>>>>> little bit >>>>>>> but also give them something that they'll really appreciate >>>>>>> comes from >>>>>>> that - Mantronix to early Bomb Squad --- where there were >>>>>>> little >>>>>>> tricks >>>>>>> in there, and you knew the producer had stuck them in there >>>>>>> because he >>>>>>> knew it would do people's heads in. And it'd be like: fucking >>>>>>> hell, how >>>>>>> did he do that? Or, that's a totally mad thing to do with >>>>>>> your >>>>>>> track. >>>>>>> But it didn't suffer because it wasn't. . ." Rob: "Wasn't a >>>>>>> showcase for >>>>>>> those ideas." Sean: "It was part of the flow and it worked. >>>>>>> That's it >>>>>>> really. That's how we've started describing it now." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "I think a lot of people, when they're constructing complex >>>>>>> music, have >>>>>>> this idea that for something maddeningly complex to change >>>>>>> into >>>>>>> something else that's maddeningly complex you've got to do it >>>>>>> suddenly," >>>>>>> says Sean. "But there are millions of ways you can do it, >>>>>>> because you >>>>>>> can have your entire track changing piece by piece as it >>>>>>> rotates, and >>>>>>> that's what we're into We like things like a puzzle where >>>>>>> it's >>>>>>> revealing >>>>>>> itself and changing. And you can almost follow it, because it >>>>>>> works the >>>>>>> same pace as your brain works. The trick is not to get it to >>>>>>> work faster >>>>>>> or slower, but to get it in tune with yourself. And obviously >>>>>>> there are >>>>>>> some people who work faster than that, and they'll hear it >>>>>>> and think >>>>>>> this is boring, and there are people who work slower than >>>>>>> that, and >>>>>>> they'll think this is too much. For us it's the right pace." >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Clint Anderson >>>>>>> Systems Engineer >>>>>>> "Freedom -- paint me a picture!" -- Burton Cummings >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Clint Anderson >>>>>>> <clinta@gmail.com <mailto:clinta@gmail.com> >>>>>>> <mailto:clinta@gmail.com <mailto:clinta@gmail.com>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> yeah its interesting i would almost say its a return to >>>>>>> their >>>>>>> classic style of the 'eternally unfolding secret tricks' >>>>>>> tracks they >>>>>>> used to do where halfway through you finally sort of >>>>>>> more or >>>>>>> less >>>>>>> figured out what they were doing to get whatever >>>>>>> effect/sound, and >>>>>>> then the second half was just that much more badass >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Sham Beam >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Bruno Gola <brunogola@gmail.com <mailto:brunogola@gmail.com>> >>>>>>> http://bgo.la/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sham Beam >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >