179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
R. Lim
To:
Date:
Sun, 6 May 2001 13:05:29 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] The Future of IDM ???
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSI.4.05L.10105061254471.15734-100000@escape.com>
In-Reply-To:
<p05010400b718735fcf48@[137.73.170.208]>
Mbox:
idm.0105.gz
On Fri, 4 May 2001, Topher wrote:
quoted 3 lines "conceptual approach"... Some artists just have no ideas so it's> "conceptual approach"... Some artists just have no ideas so it's > easier to make rubbish and say it's art (I'm thinking Vladislav > Delay, Oval, SND, Terre Thaemlitz, Kid 606, etc... ) - and I think
This statement is kind of funny, inasmuch as "conceptual" sort of implies that the ideas are more important than details of execution (so how can you have conceptual art without ideas?). Then again, I suppose you have a narrower definition of "ideas". At any rate, I'm not a big fan of any of the above except for Oval, whose records keep getting better and better. In a way, Popp has been doing for years what Autechre are starting to cotton onto- developing real time environments for making music loosely parameterized by live inputs. From Dok on, his records have been remarkably dense and interesting throughout. Note that David Tudor and Roland Kayn spent decades on this approach with analog gear (to different results). -rob --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org