On Sat, 31 Mar 2001, mu wrote:
quoted 3 lines I don't consider Coltrane free jazz. He is clearly a precursor, and did> I don't consider Coltrane free jazz. He is clearly a precursor, and did
> much to expand the vocabulary of jazz, but I don't believe he rejected
> structures so much as expanded them.
Later Coltrane took many a cue from Albert Ayler, so I guess if you don't
think of Ayler as free jazz... I agree that Trane wasn't really an
innovator, but Christ, _Interstellar Space_ ain't no Kind of Blue.
quoted 7 lines [someone else said]:> [someone else said]:
> > I don't agree with this, I think coletrane & coleman are probably
> > the best and most of what came after was poor imatation (with
> > exceptions of course).
>
> That sounds to me like an opinion with a very limited perspective - and a
> whole other can of worms, and I'm not hungry right now.
Yeah- I gotta agree that this is a pretty retarded statement to make, no
matter how many painkillers you're on.
-rob
ps- Jan Garbarek's first four albums are very worthwhile
pps- will get to Doron after intense Phthalo listening activity
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org