179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 19:18:21 +0000 (GMT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] dancing about architecture
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.30.0101161900060.774-100000@omni.state51.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.HPP.3.96.1010116122027.13365D-100000@arthur.avalon.net>
Mbox:
idm.0101.gz
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Kent williams wrote:
quoted 2 lines When it comes to writing about music, it's something I do a lot, so I> When it comes to writing about music, it's something I do a lot, so I > think that it can be done. Otherwise I wouldn't bother.
yes. but you can only go so far. we (or at least, i) lack the diction to describe sound to any level of satisfaction. when we describe sound using words like 'bright', 'dark', 'textured', 'hard', 'sharp', we're drawing in words used for our other senses. i can feel some satisfaction in describing a piece of music using elaborate genres, like 'jazzy french techno' or 'minimal glitch', but any other person will interpret that differently from me. so talking about music is hard. everyone interprets music in their own way... no wonder reviewers end up talking about themselves and the other music the like. but it is a good process to go through. i guess dancing about architecture is good too. so i am agreeing with you, and adding a tangent... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org