179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Josh Davison
To:
n:h
Cc:
atomly ,
Date:
Tue, 9 Jan 2001 17:24:36 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] kyma/autechre/richard devine
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSF.4.21.0101091716330.91220-100000@shell-3.enteract.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.MXS.4.20.0101091739580.13636-100000@tl1.toshoklabs.com>
Mbox:
idm.0101.gz
it's exactly the same problem as the 10,000 jokers with electric guitars in their garages, wailing away trying to be the next nirvana or limp bizkit or whatever ... once the tools are readily available people will start picking them up and trying to become craftsmen. it's easy as hell to download a granulation patch and start making a racket and "sound like autechre" but the key to real Quality (in the Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenence sense of the word) is not the tools, but the creative impulse behind their use. If you just try to sound like Autechre, chances are you will come up with a reasonable facsimile of an Autechre sound. But the thing that people should remember when they are trying to be "the next Autechre" is that Autechre did not become the touchstone of IDM by trying to be "the next Aphex Twin" ... they came at it with a completely individual approach and a distinctive sound. Anyway, with regard to filtering for Quality: that's what this list is for... when "the next Autechre" does finally appear, you'll probably hear about it here. -- String Theory : Digital Music for Humans http://www.enteract.com/~yoshi/index.cgi --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org