179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
atomly
To:
Date:
Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:48:09 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] Max/MSP question
Msg-Id:
<20010108154809.A68310@atomly.com>
In-Reply-To:
<4.2.2.20010108163248.01325600@mail.clemson.edu>
Mbox:
idm.0101.gz
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:45:36PM -0500, Bill Wright wrote:
quoted 7 lines Audiomulch better than buzz? hmm....Audiomulch is like Buzz, only with> Audiomulch better than buzz? hmm....Audiomulch is like Buzz, only with > "machines" to use (as you can write new machines for buzz, but the ones in > Audiomulch are set to what comes with it). Only thing that Audio Mulch > does better as far as an I can tell is the granulation stuff, but there are > better programs for granulation (Crusher-X, Granulab). > > Try them both I suppose, .....they're both freely downloadable
Yea... My only real problem with Buzz is that none of the synths really sound that good unless you want to make cheesey clubby trance (AKA demo music). I use Buzz a lot more than I use AudioMulch, however. -- :: atomly :: atomly@atomly.com | atomly@atdot.org | atomly@curiousnetworks.com http://www.atomly.com | http://www.mp3.com/atomly --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org