179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Iris Garrelfs
To:
Date:
Mon, 30 Oct 2000 13:08:18 +0000
Subject:
[idm] RE: labels/labelhopping
Msg-Id:
<B62320A1.166D%irisg@sprawl.org.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<972896668.4085.ezmlm@hyperreal.org>
Mbox:
idm.0010.gz
Let's not forget that small labels are in no position to pay an artist enough money to live and make more music on ...
quoted 31 lines Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 23:46:41 +0100> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 23:46:41 +0100 > To: idm@hyperreal.org > From: Luther van Dross <lutherblisset001@hotmail.com> > Subject: labels/labelhopping > Message-ID: <39FB574E.C474D07@hotmail.com> > >> I totally agree with those who start their own labels to release their >> own >> projects or to promote new ones, but many of these new labels seem to >> be >> trying to release cds by already established >> artists. Another question I have for the artists themselves: why not >> stay on >> one label for awhile? Just think of how many artists only record one >> disc >> for a label. What label do you run? >> >> Soel. > > That, indeed, is a fair point Soel. I suppose it's a profile thang - get > the label known through various visiting artists / remixes in order to > promote the lesser known / new ones you've found. This works to some > degree in that you've at least internalised the label identity for this > reason, however, whether or not people largely retain an interest in a > label once the artist has hopped is something only the labels have a > handle on. In terms of artists releasing on numerous labels, again, > wider promotion sounds like one likely reason. Or maybe they just can't > say no to flattery. > > Long live organic produce and cliff divers. > Luther
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org