179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Matt Anderson
To:
IDM LIST
Date:
Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:54:48 -0700
Subject:
RE: [idm] why digital is bad
Msg-Id:
<NCBBKNDBGLJADEIFLFFPGEGMCHAA.655321@telus.net>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.GSO.3.96.1001005153345.11974A-100000@falco.kuci.uci.edu>
Mbox:
idm.0010.gz
I really hate to feed this fire because as someone correctly mentioned, it gets us nowhere... But... Isn't this debate stopped dead as soon as we are recording at a bit rate far past cd quality? If the digital standard was twice or more the compact disc standard it would theoretically be twice as good, wouldn't it? I assume it's the same as different tape speeds produce different quality recording. Faster=better... Perhaps I am completley wrong, but that is my understanding of the digital/analogue relationship... Plus, to not see the glaring advantage of lossless duplication is insanity IMHO! -Matt- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org