179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
component
To:
Josh Davison ,
Date:
Thu, 5 Oct 2000 18:48:00 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] why digital is bad
Msg-Id:
<01bb01c02f1e$55083720$ac54343f@oemcomputer>
Mbox:
idm.0010.gz
Only on the 5% of recordings that are recorded analogue anymore. Raab component records www.mindstorm.com/component ----- Original Message ----- From: Josh Davison <yoshi@enteract.com> To: <idm@hyperreal.org> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 5:55 PM Subject: [idm] why digital is bad
quoted 38 lines analogue facts:> analogue facts: > * an analogue signal contains an infinite amount of data. > > * a finite amount of data is lost when transferring an analogue signal > from one analogue medium to another. > > * subtracting a finite amount of information from an infinite source still > yields an infinite amount of information. > > * a record has lost a finite amount of data every time you play it, yet > still retains an infinite amount > > > digital facts: > * a digital signal contains a finite amount of data. > > * an infinite amount of data is lost when converting an analogue signal to > a digital one. > > * if transferred digitally, no data is lost when transmitting digital > information from one source to another, but you will never get the > infinite amount of lost data back. > > * a cd is actually missing an infinite amount of data compared to > an analogue recording of the same material. > > don't you feel like you've been cheated? > > -- > String Theory : Digital Music for Humans > http://www.enteract.com/~yoshi/index.cgi > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org