179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
{{{5x}}}
To:
Ian Doyle
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 11 Sep 2000 21:07:31 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] IDM in the US mainstream
Msg-Id:
<39BD9DF3.C3D4EE2A@home.com>
Mbox:
idm.0009.gz
i fully agree. the best way to test this theory is to play, i dunno, mandell or something in the car and see how your friends react. quotes in my car: "what is this shit?" "please turn it off?" "can we listen to something else??" "your order comes to $5.16" whoops, that last one was at mcdonalds. anyway, you get what i mean. i try hard to get people to listen, i really do. it just doesn't work. i've had very favorable reactions towards track 12 off the new marumari cd, though. that and iambic 5 poetry always get a good response. (((shaun)))
quoted 12 lines sorry, but since when did IDM have a definitive drum / sound effects /> sorry, but since when did IDM have a definitive drum / sound effects / > structure? for me the whole idea of IDM is to be as creative as possible > without limitations... for me IDM is the underground before the > mainstream... > it's the experiment before the bandwagon. > although i do agree that IDM music will never catch on in the US, because > most (all) pop acts rely on their videos and images to sell their music and > often try to sell the image with it. but most IDM music makers are > experimental and often extreme, and their sound is not too often accepted by > the 'mainstream market', therefore they are not seen as money/image/trend > makers, and therefore they do not get funded to sell the music. > i know this'll start a nuclear war of words, and i apologise.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org