179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
zachary mastoon
To:
,
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 15 Jun 2000 15:05:18 CDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] Big Soup Question - Sampling Commentary
Msg-Id:
<20000615200518.50452.qmail@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0006.gz
quoted 28 lines From: esa ruoho <esaruoho@dlc.fi>>From: esa ruoho <esaruoho@dlc.fi> >To: Chris Fahey <chris.fahey@raremedium.com> >CC: idm <idm@hyperreal.org> >Subject: Re: [idm] Big Soup Question - Sampling Commentary >Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 22:33:08 +0300 > >Chris Fahey wrote: > > > that sample is from a 12" that my girlfriend has, some old educational > > > record. it has an old(ish) man explaining filters, first he > > > says something > > > normally then throught the filter. > > I'm not saying sampling is bad or that Luke Vibert is bad. I'm > > just saying its sad to see someone use a sample when doing the actual >work > > might have generated more interesting results without too much >additional > > effort. > >i'm just guessing here but what if he chose to sample that because >of the inflection and the texture of the voice, or that he liked the >idea of having something like that in there. sometimes hearing something >and sampling it is so much faster and so much more fresh than putting it >down to bits and plagiarising it yourself, with possibly even worse >results. when the original is "right", why _try_ to re-do it? > >i know when i finally get around to sampling these linguaphone vinyls >i'll sample the bits that crack me up, and not write them down and >speak/recreate them myself just for the point of being original..
exactly. on KMD's album, "Mr. Hood," they staged conversations with a dusty language record, sampling bits and pieces of it to make it coherent. they even threw in a dis from the record, "your mother likes to visit the old churches." IMHO, sampling is used most widely for not only what is being said/played/whatever, but for capturing 1) the medium on which it was recorded (catching pops of vinyl, tape hiss, etc.), 2) nuances of the recording itself, and 3) possible cultural/musical references construed in the music (i.e., a LOT of artists in hip-hop sample the music and lyrics of their predecessors.) luke could've recreated the ring modulation himself, but that's besides the point. i am not saying vibert or any other artist using extensive samples has a certain goal of retaining any of the above qualities i mentioned, but i think you'll agree sampling richard pryor for instance is a lot funnier and authentic than saying whatever it is he said yourself. zachary zacharymastoon@hotmail.com np- pole 1 ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org