179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
.
To:
Date:
Thu, 25 May 2000 10:38:41 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] biosphere- old vs new and stuff.
Msg-Id:
<000b01bfc670$116483a0$66440418@elcjn1.sdca.home.com>
Mbox:
idm.0005.gz
quoted 7 lines how do patashnik & the soundtrack to Insomnia compare?> >how do patashnik & the soundtrack to Insomnia compare? > > Not as strong in my opinion. I think the Insomnia tracks meander a bit > much like, well a soundtrack, while Patashnik is more techno-ish than > ambient because its older material. Its not bad, but if you are looking > for Substrata you won't find it. Id also get the Phonophani cd from > Biophon, its not Geir but its on his label.
I like the first two Biosphere albums better than anything he has done since. It's a different style than the later material.. The first two albums are in an ambient/techno style but it's some of the best ambient/techno out there. Microgravity is an absolute classic. Patashnik is really good too. I would rate Microgravity as my favorite Biosphere album and Patashnik #2. I'd put the Jenssen/Namlook album Fires of Ork right up there with Microgravity as well. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org