179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Irene McC
To:
,
Date:
Wed, 5 Apr 2000 16:39:52 +0200
Subject:
RE: [idm] repetetive beats
Msg-Id:
<E12cqui-000Eti-00@smtp03.iafrica.com>
In-Reply-To:
<61E3BAA0DA54D311A91D00508B44EBFF50763C@postman-pat.nettec.co.uk>
Mbox:
idm.0004.gz
On 4 Apr 00, Andrew Cowper wrote re RE: [idm] repetetive beats:
quoted 1 line Also witness Autechre's "Flutter" whose beats never repeat. A protest.> Also witness Autechre's "Flutter" whose beats never repeat. A protest.
Yes, indeed - I have the Anti EP with that little blurb on it.
quoted 2 lines Designed to outlaw large outdoor raves, which were scaring the squires> Designed to outlaw large outdoor raves, which were scaring the squires > in the shires at the time.
Hmmm, yes, I can imagine... Does this law still hold good? Has it (ever / frequently) been applied? How does it get proven or measured? How many beats must be repeated before it becomes illegal? Totally Spinal Tap-ish concept, isn't it? Sheesh !!! The mind boggles. This is more oppressive that what I'm used to living with in South Africa {!} I * np : Facts & Fictions / Asian Dub Foundation --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org