179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Nate Harrison \[Toshok Laboratories\]
To:
Cc:
WARD Giles ,
Date:
Mon, 26 Oct 1998 13:37:41 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Biosphere (was: 1994)
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSI.3.95.981026133448.16776A-100000@we1.web-elite.com>
In-Reply-To:
<19981026182019.12242.qmail@hyperreal.org>
Mbox:
idm.9810.gz
Just to give another perspective, I f'n love Substrata. Drippy primal, organic ambient. No slick production techniques/oddball rhythm programming here.That one track with the string section and the drunk/old Russian dialogue gets me everytime. I've listened to this record at least once a week since I bought it last year... peace Nate On Mon, 26 Oct 1998 mike@hyperreal.org wrote:
quoted 21 lines WARD Giles wrote:> WARD Giles wrote: > > ah.. the 'golden age' of IDM ;-) ..currently enjoying the more ambient > > tracks on Biosphere's Patashnik album.. whats the more recent Biosphere > > like? > > Substrata is like the more ambient tracks on Patashnik. There don't seem > to be any drum machines at all, although it's sometimes rhythmic enough > that you can pick out a tempo in several tracks. Definitely not dance > music, intelligent or otherwise. You can tell it's Biosphere -- same > thick, dark yet warm production quality. I like about 50% of it a lot, 30% > of it a little, and 1 or 2 tracks I could do without. I was lukewarm on > the whole thing at first, but it grew on me. > > - Mike > > ______________________________________________________________________ > Mike Brown / Hyperreal | Director, Hyperreal Music Archive > PO Box 61334 | http://www.hyperreal.org/music/ > Denver CO 80206-8334 USA | > >