179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Stevens
To:
Date:
Thu, 06 Aug 1998 22:40:09 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Whether Chantal`s actually any good.
Msg-Id:
<35cd2dc4.17276332@post.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<3.0.3.32.19980806161913.007e5820@titan.vcu.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9808.gz
On Thu, 06 Aug 1998 16:19:13 -0400, you wrote:
quoted 3 lines i think it's because Chantal's music (or, rather, AE & disjecta's music>i think it's because Chantal's music (or, rather, AE & disjecta's music >with chantal's blathering) is 100x more interesting than most things Bjork >has claimed to have done.
Well, I guess you had to be in the UK when that whole Sugarcubes thing took off to really appreciate her (or at least not come out with ridiculous statements like the one above). I'm on no Bjork butt-licking mission here. I've bought loads of Bjork, loads of Mira Calix and enjoy them both. If you want to restrict your tastes, then that's your lookout. But let's look at what we've got -- two Mira Calix 10-inches on Warp (plus a compilation appearance) produced by Booth/Brown and Clifford against a whole stack of Bjork productions handled by Graham Massey, 808 State, Mark Bell, Tim Simenon, Plaid, Black Dog, Funkstorung, Tricky, etc. /\/)ark http://www.sonance.demon.co.uk/