179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Che
To:
Intelligent Dumb Music
Date:
Sat, 2 May 1998 09:32:24 +0000 ()
Subject:
Re: (idm) Chocolate Weasel.
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSI.3.96.980502093203.28088A-100000@beacon.synthcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9805.gz
At 11:43 PM 4/28/98 -0500, Boffin wrote:
quoted 8 lines Hold on my brother. I've got the music for body lockers 12" right here.>Hold on my brother. I've got the music for body lockers 12" right here. >You must have the CD. The 12" rocks my world. Especially the Shatners >Bassoon remix which is used on the Spegettification album if I'm not >mistaken... Gotta love that bassline. From what I can tell if a CD has an >edit mix, the album version, reprise, and the dub version....which are all >basically the same, you've got a shite single. But since the 12" has three >remixes (body croppers, shatners bassoon, lazy lofters) it's nice, if the >remixers are good, but there always is that Sam and Valley Remix thing.
But how long is the body croppers mix? On the CD it's 1:31. Shatners Bassoon is a remix of Reworked From Scratch Backwards. What I was saying is that it & the dub for lazy loafters mixes are all that's worthwhile on the single, maybe 11 minutes worth. Not a bargain. Does the 12" also have 5 tracks?
quoted 4 lines I'm kind of questioning those three supposed remixers of the single. Since>I'm kind of questioning those three supposed remixers of the single. Since >the shatners bassoon version appeared on the album (under a different name, >I think) I'm assuming that all of the remixers are of themselves, Chocalate >Weasel. Am I right?
Yes. Actually, I prefer things this way, as long as the remixes stray from the original. I hate having to blow $10 on some obscure single just for one stinkin' remix. At 11:55 PM 4/28/98 +0000, alalan@PO-Box.McGill.CA wrote:
quoted 3 lines Read an article where these guys go on a "drum 'n bass is dead">Read an article where these guys go on a "drum 'n bass is dead" >tirade, talking about how its worn out, unoriginal and what not these >days....
What article? Magazine? Website? Do tell! Che