Isn't Aphex supposed to have a huge backlog of unreleased material waiting
to see the light of day? Personally I don't think it matters so long as it
sounds new and fresh, having said that I quite like the sound of old
recordings, it's something you can't always re-create.
Paul.
At 13:44 13/03/00 +0000, you wrote:
quoted 36 lines --- Simon Walley <cim_@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>--- Simon Walley <cim_@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> The only reason to re-issue deleted things like this is if demand
>> (and I
>> mean general, overall demand, not just hardcore IDM demand) and
>> interest
>> reaches a certain level AND most importantly if the artist wants to
>> do it.
>> And the bulk of them don't want to. Its a shame but they have no
>> interest in
>> visiting the past again.
>>
>> However, some do - watch this space :)
>
>Let me guess - you've persuaded Steve Pickton to dig out some old
>un-released stuff and you're gonna release it on Focus?
>
>Anyway, I agree with your general point, people like Kirk Di Giorgio
>and Plaid would prefer that we concentrate on their new stuff as I'm
>sure that they think it's far superior. And who knows, in another 8
>years when we look back, we may be agreeing with them (and probably
>saying 'how come those pladlads don't release something as sublime as
>Shackbu any more....').
>
>Matt.
>____________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
>or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org