179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 8 Mar 2000 19:42:37 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) auto reply woes.
Msg-Id:
<6.30fbeae.25f84d7d@aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.0003.gz
In a message dated 9/03/00 6:10:10 jpklein@flash.net writes:
quoted 3 lines Whatever you may think about the autoreply (good or bad), Matt is correct.> Whatever you may think about the autoreply (good or bad), Matt is correct. > Replying to sender always used to be *just* to the sender - not to the > list.
It has definitely changed beyond the standard, which was previous. 313 and Ambient still have the previous reply function. Why the sudden change for idm. Who on this list actually likes this change? A_Zed --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org