At 02:43 PM 9/9/97 -0700, gg2g4ink@sprynet.com (Gil Gershman) wrote:
quoted 12 lines mclance (Lance McGannon) wrote:>
>mclance (Lance McGannon) wrote:
>
>>GPR dropped the ball by not releasing anything new in
>>ages. If I submitted a release to a label and had to
>>wait a year for it to be released then i would consider
>>taking it elsewhere as well.
>
>if you only knew as much as you think you know, mclance!
>there's much more to this story than i'm telling here.
>i simplified it. unfortunately, it's anything BUT simple.
>
Since gg2g4ink@sprynet.com aka bloodrush7@aol.com (Gil
Gershman) says there is something else going on here
that he cannot talk about I fwded all these messages
to novamute and asked them to comment on them. i will
post their reply to these accusations to the idm as
soon as i get one. We'll see how "simple" the situation
really is.
quoted 6 lines Besides, if you want to blame somebody shouldn't gg2g4ink>>Besides, if you want to blame somebody shouldn't gg2g4ink
>>(Gil Gershman) blame Luke Slater for accepting the deal?
>
>i most certainly do!
>he and Mute are both guilty.
>
If slater is so guilty why are is gg2g4ink@sprynet.com
aka bloodrush7@aol.com (Gil Gershman) focusing all the
blame and calls for boycott to just novamute? why not
call for a boycott of all of slaters releases? should
we boycott peacefrog, djax, irdial, jelly jam, kudos
and gpr as well because he releases on those labels
too? and maybe we should boycott all the labels luke
slater does remixes for like harthouse, r&s, internal,
and cosmic? supposedly he's guilty too right? he should
pay for the crime that gg2g4ink@sprynet.com aka
bloodrush7@aol.com (Gil Gershman) accuses him of.
quoted 5 lines After all, he is the one who shopped his material to other>>After all, he is the one who shopped his material to other
>>labels. Nova Mute just accepted what he submitted. Nova Mute
>>may not have even know of Slater's other obligations. Looks
>>like gg2g4ink (Gil Gershman) is blaming the messegner again.
>quoted 14 lines here's the question:>here's the question:
>did Slater have the RIGHT to shop an album to
>another label when GPR had already paid him for it?
>
>>I'll agree that artists have some responsibility to the
>>labels that sign them but the labels also have a responsibility
>>to release the material submitted to them in a timely fashion.
>>It doesn't appear that GPR did that. But, from the look of the
>>promos that gg2g4ink (Gil Gershman) is treating with effigy, it
>>looks like Nova Mute is releasing material in a timely fashion.
>
>Nova Mute is releasing a record which is NOT THEIRS TO RELEASE!
>that is wrong.
>
Come to think of it, Luke Slater releases material on the GPR
label under the guises of 7th Plain and Morganistic NOT as
Luke Slater. So it might be that GPR does not have the right
to this release because it came out under his Luke Slater
guise not under the guises that he formerly used for his GPR
releases. Or does gg2g4ink@sprynet.com aka bloodrush7@aol.com (Gil
Gershman) think that every luke slater release is supposed to
come out on GPR? If that's the case then we need to get on
Peacefrog's case because Luke releases his Planetary Assault
Systems, Deputy Dawg and Luke Slater material there as well.
quoted 2 lines why is this so difficult to comprehend, mclance (Lance McGannon)?!>why is this so difficult to comprehend, mclance (Lance McGannon)?!
>
It seems like the comprehension problem is with gg2g4ink@sprynet.com
aka bloodrush7@aol.com (Gil Gershman). But we will see how nova
mute comprehends the accusations of gg2g4ink@sprynet.com aka
bloodrush7@aol.com (Gil Gershman) for the final word on this
situation. i will post their response as soon as i get it.
np: Freq: Xirtam 2 (kenny larkin remix)
I must be going daft in my old age!
Cheers!
-->-Lance---
p.o. box 450715
westlake, ohio 44145
united states