At 08:18 PM 8/23/97 +0100, you wrote:
quoted 15 lines In message <3.0.1.32.19970822181454.006c24b0@pop.mindspring.com>, Ravis
>In message <3.0.1.32.19970822181454.006c24b0@pop.mindspring.com>, Ravis
>One <ravis1@mindspring.com> writes
>>>
>>>what's this idea about syncing things then? what are you on about?
>>>everything that you hear on RDJ is absolutely as it was intended. it's not
>>>about syncing 32nds and 16ths and having smooth rhythms, it's about
>>expression
>>>
>>Syncing as in on beat. Even funk players play on beat, or on the back beat
>>with some shuffle. RDJ showcases some sloppy programming. If that's what
>>was intended, fine. If he's laughing at the people who bought it, so am I.
>>
>
>Uh? You're suggesting there are rules to music....well, if there *are*
>rules then I'm glad someone's breaking them.
I do not follow or imply any rules. I just like Natural rhythm and dislike
RDJ album. Note, I said:
quoted 1 line If that's what was intended, fine.
>>If that's what was intended, fine.
If you blow up a lab doing an experiment, is that cool or RDJ?
_
/ \ /\
/__/ \
/ \ \
/ \AVIS \\\\
ravis1@mindspring.com
http://www.mindspring.com/~ravis1/