Mark
I didn't stat this one really, and at first I never had any complaints with the
guy. I only acted BEFORE he started. He threatened to flame me on the list and
if I let him it would have been al wrong. I don't have any problem with the
trade other than he is bitchin' about something that is no big deal. He has
emailed me a bunch of times in the last few days crying about a friggin' inlay
card I DO NOT HAVE. What does this guy want me to do: send everything
back? That's pretty unfair. Call off an entire deal b/c he's missing ONE inlay
card. I didn't realize I lost it, I apologized to him immediately. He thinks I
pulled one over on him err sumpin. Why would that be. He tells me the CD, read
that again, THE CD is valueless because it is missing an inlay card. That is
terribly false. A promo CD, like he sent me, should be valueless cuz they are not
intended to sold in the first place! Sorry I know this guy has good rep, but I won't
let him use that to ruin my rep for one little piece of paper, that is why I threw
it to the list before him.
gil
Mark B. Conklin wrote:
quoted 18 lines At 04:31 PM 8/4/97 +0000, you wrote:>
> At 04:31 PM 8/4/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
> >let me apologize for my 'bad'language in my reaction to ROWLAND
> >ATKINSON.
>
> I've dealt with Rowland many times and he's has been an excellent trader as
> far as I'm concerned. He even sent me the DJ Cam cd "Substance" right after
> an agreement was made and then waited for almost 2 months until I could get
> my end of the deal to him (had to order it - Octopus 1 BTW). He never
> bitched once.
>
> I'm not exactly sure why the flame was sent to the list, but now I feel the
> need to stick up for Rowland. He's never done me wrong on many trades.
>
> It's ridiculous how these things get out of hand.
>
> MC