179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Christopher Fahey
To:
'idm@hyperreal.com'
Date:
Fri, 13 Jun 1997 14:19:31 -0400
Subject:
RE: (idm) 12" vs.CDs
Msg-Id:
<01BC7804.D22406F0.chrisfahey@mindspring.com>
Mbox:
idm.9706.gz
On Friday, June 13, 1997 1:18 PM, Random Junk [SMTP:jsd@gamespot.com] wrote:
quoted 6 lines the whole idea of a 44khz RECORD (vinyl anyway) is to laugh... how> the whole idea of a 44khz RECORD (vinyl anyway) is to laugh... how > many people's turntables even go close to 16khz? (that would be a > 32k > record, of course). how many "average human" ears are even good > enough to hear above 16khz any more? if you go to loud clubs a lot, > chances are your cutoff is even lower than that.
Chris Fahey Sez: I just thought of something. If the human ear is supposed to be so very weak that CD audio far exceeds it's ability to detect, then how come so many folks can hear the difference between vinyl and CD? Usually they are probably liars, just like people who think they know something about wine. But here's an idea: Although our *ears* cannot detect the difference in the sound form the speaker, maybe the *environment* itself reacts differently to the sound. The little vibrations which the sound causes in the room, the way the room acoustically alters what we hear, may significantly differ from vinyl to CD. These differences are accentuated by the vibrating objects in the room/environment, so that they then become detectible to the anal retentive audiophile ear. Imagine a dish on a shelf which vibrates one way when a 44khz cd plays a tone and another way when a record plays the tone. The sound of it's vibration becomes part of the listener's experience of the sound. Am I on drugs? -CF