179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Zander
To:
cl
Cc:
,
Date:
Thu, 22 May 1997 03:04:57 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) D&B Implode
Msg-Id:
<Pine.A32.3.93.970522025950.18736M-100000@mustique.u.arizona.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<33824CFA.5A15@enteract.com>
Mbox:
idm.9705.gz
quoted 10 lines i might have to agree with mr. bowie here. there are certain elements> i might have to agree with mr. bowie here. there are certain elements > that make a dnb song a dnb song. since every song has to contain these > elements in varying degrees there is a limit as to how far it can go and > still be dnb. (this applies to all styles of music, it just seems the > dnb elements are more narrow) obviously there are extremely talented > artists who cam innovate (pusher,afx,dot), but i would be hard pressed > to believe that most people could tell the difference between 75% of the > dnb being produced right now. for example ltj bukem's mixmag sounds > like one song. that doesnt mean i dont like it, it just doesnt cover > alot of ground.
I disagree with that statement there is a pretty wide variety of drum n bass. I don't really think Dom & Roland sounds anything like Squarepusher. Photek and Source Direct has a similar energy but I can definitely tell a difference. Panacea and Decoder are some of the dark D & B stuff, its very different from the above mentioned groups. Alot of the stuff on Rawkus/Primitive and Mick Harris's Possible label has a unique sound. I have been very impressed with many of these artists and their ability to push the genre and not stagnate it. William Samuels