Franz wrote:
quoted 9 lines At 01.28 97-04-06 -0800, you wrote:
>
> At 01.28 97-04-06 -0800, you wrote:
> >dont you think the reason this list has been 'shit' of late is
> >that the bulk of the discussion revolves around daft punk/chemical bros et al,
> >mixmaster morris also posted to this effect recently - i was just trying to
> >make the point that there is so much music out there that _should_ be getting
> >discussed that _isn't_
>
> I think Mixmaster Morris can take his elitistshit and shove it!
grin - i dont see it as being elitist, there is a differance between elitism and
genuinely caring about the 'scene' you are involved in, morris has been around
since day one and is one person i have a lot of respect for..his opinion
counts for a lot in my book
quoted 3 lines I can't see how talking about daft punk prevents you from talking about "so
> I can't see how talking about daft punk prevents you from talking about "so
> much music that should be discussed". afaik there isn't a limit of mails to
> the list, so go ahead. talk away.
it dosent prevent me, but when the bulk of each idm digest is taking up
discussing *mainstream* acts such as daft punk/chemicals - something is
wrong, wasn't idm was originally set up to discuss forward thinking electronic
music
stuart @ 4thworld
--
http://dialspace.dial.pipex.com/4thworld/
check the 'propoganda' page - interviews
+ features on black dog/ as one/ musik aus
strom / jimpster / compost / irdial + more