On Sun, 6 Apr 1997, sm@4th World wrote:
quoted 5 lines dont you think the reason this list has been 'shit' of late is> dont you think the reason this list has been 'shit' of late is
> that the bulk of the discussion revolves around daft punk/chemical bros et al,
> mixmaster morris also posted to this effect recently - i was just trying to
> make the point that there is so much music out there that _should_ be getting
> discussed that _isn't_
hm. i don't think it's too shitty. if i see something i don't like, i hit
d. but i do think the roots of idm thread is one of the best i've seen in
awhile (i'm gonna jump in on that one sometime soon).
and as for certain bands not getting discussed: regardless of who's being
discussed and how many bands are being discussed, there're going to be
some bands that are going to be overlooked. and in this particular genre
(whatever each and every one of you want to call it and whoever you all
want to include--don't wanna start another what is idm thread) obscurity
is the name of the game. :)
np bee gees : night fever. <- NOT idm
* * +
* * \|/
* *----]euroboy[----]micah.stupak[----]mjsst87+@pitt.edu[------e-+
* >>bitwise.operators /|\
* * * +
i hate anyone who sees me as an illusion of passion.