179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Anika & Johan
To:
Date:
Sat, 15 Mar 1997 19:50:43 +0100 (MET)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Classes in IDM???
Msg-Id:
<v01510102af50acdb0625@[130.236.16.6]>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
quoted 11 lines One of the aspects of electronic music that intrigues me so much, is>> One of the aspects of electronic music that intrigues me so much, is >> artists like Autechre who approach their music with the intent to create >> electronic sounds, not music that could be reproduced by accoustic >> instruments. Certainly artists like Kraftwerk have been trying for decades >> to make machine music more acceptable in traditional spheres. But it >> bothers me that some people still think in terms of accoustic as real, and >> digital as something synthetic.... making it less than real. It's like >> blowing through a pipe is less real than turning a knob. > >Some things you can only do with acoustic instruments, and some only with >synths. We shouldn't we unite them, if we can make better music that way ?
That's right, when you blend things then you normally get the best result. That's why debates like the analog vs. digital one is pretty pointless, because you can take the good things from analog synthesizers and integrate with the possiblities that digital equipment has brought us. I think Autechres latest album is a good example of this, because it sounds certainly more digital than their previous works do, but I guess there's a lot analog shit going on there as well... Johan. ,,, /'~'\ ( 0 0 ) +----------------------------oOOO--(_)--OOOo----------------------------+ Johan Jaatinen Electronic music maker Anika@Info.LiU.SE Oooo. Radio DJ MU WILL RISE AGAIN .oooO ( ) Vegetarian +-----------------------------( )----) /------------------------------+ \ ( (_/ \_)