179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Robert C. Galbraith
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 7 Jan 1997 19:30:28 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) in defense of orbital
Msg-Id:
<199701080330.TAA27986@dfw-ix4.ix.netcom.com>
Mbox:
idm.9701.gz
quoted 4 lines Maybe orbital thought of doing it then decided not too because they> >Maybe orbital thought of doing it then decided not too because they >thought it was crap. Just a thought. No slight intended to the above >artists. I just think that's a little bit presumptuous. The second
thought
quoted 4 lines is that something innovative is not always good. It does make>is that something innovative is not always good. It does make >interesting listening though....but may not necessarily hold up to >repeated listens as well as something done really well that is not >necessarily innovative. I say these things generally, not necesarily
in
quoted 4 lines reference to the artists you mention.>reference to the artists you mention. > >Tony >
Well one definately positive thing that I can say about Orbital is that they got me into electronic music beyond the industrial stuff I was listening to circa 91. If I hadn't started by listening to Orbital, I probably wouldn't have dug deeper to be listening to the stuff I am to day. They've also had a huge influence on the music that I write too. ROB:)!!!!