179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
andreu osika
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 06 Nov 1996 03:29:53 -0500
Subject:
Re: (idm) techno on pot..or...
Msg-Id:
<1.5.4.32.19961106082953.00676c88@pop.mindspring.com>
Mbox:
idm.9611.gz
At 12:16 AM 11/6/96 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 9 lines so what kind of music are you into.......>so what kind of music are you into....... > >........i tell them its called "intelligent dance music" > >they all start laughing at that, and i start to wounder - > > are they close minded, or does this kind of nomenclature > create a discredible perception/bias for the unexperienced > masses of idm.
While I don't think credibility via nomenclature should be a paramount concern - certainly as more artists achieve higher profiles there'll be a marketing boy/girl wonder at some level to take care of that issue, so that everyone can understand - it does seem that "intelligent" is problematic in that when a line is drawn that defines "intelligent," by default an "other" is created and what is that - "moronic" etc? Sure you see the point. How about "innovative?" - it seems that, as much as anything is a goal of much of the musics discussed on idm, but again hard to define. Plus, the obvious that all music here isn't necessarily "dance" music. An interesting question, and a good topic for conversation but hopefully not at the expense of talking about the music itself. Take care, Lawrence