Oh! I'm sorry. I didn't mean to chime in there and make it sound like I thought you
where an idiot. I just thought that the way Lee put that was really good. I have
tried to say the same thing be for but it always comes out sounding like I'm a
snob... which might me true... I hope not. Sorry it was pertaining to your
comments specifically. Still, what he says is true.
-=GB=-
gweinstock@HWS.EDU wrote:
quoted 25 lines For the love of god, let me clear my name. as I already wrote to Lee> For the love of god, let me clear my name. as I already wrote to Lee
> (privately) I am in way a musician. I stated in the project proposal that
> it might be interesting to try the by-the-numbers approach using
> fruityloops and see if the results approached something professional
> sounding, thus showing how far technology has come in putting the bedroom
> musician at the same level as a recording studio. I don't condone this
> method of creating music. I wanted to see how much the playing
> field has been leveled. Hopefully this clears things up a bit.
> -Gabe
>
> > Lee Azzarello wrote:
> >
> > > It is unfortunate that you think this way. If you define IDM as a strict
> > > form that can be copied and reproduced you should stop now...form is
> > > fluid. Commodification of of form leads to exploitation. New form are not
> > > codified.
> >
> > Absolutely! I couldn't agree more. I really like the way you put that. Simple
> > and to the point.
> >
> > -=GB=-
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org