179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Gregory Ed Sullivan
To:
Moran
Cc:
Eylon I ,
Date:
Fri, 17 Nov 1995 21:19:43 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) idm
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SOL.3.91.951117210603.10086B-100000@strauss.udel.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.SOL.3.91.951117115047.9831E-100000@qlink>
Mbox:
idm.9511.gz
I don't understand how Yes's unintelligible lyrics have anything to do with Laetitia Sadier's (Sterolab) mostly political/philosophical lyrics. I have never got a cheesy "prog" feeling from Stereolab, only because the way they project their sound on record immediately dispells those attributes. But I am not going to argue that they are dance music, because they aren't. Just thought I'd see what other people though compared to my own opinion. Thanks for the feedback. greg. On Fri, 17 Nov 1995, Moran wrote:
quoted 23 lines On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, Eylon I wrote:> On Sat, 18 Nov 1995, Eylon I wrote: > > > >I am also wondering what opinions idm subscribers have about Stereolab. Its > > >hard to classify them as anything in particular, but I assume they > > >probably share fans with the idm genre. I wouldn't readily > > >call it dance music, but they definately have created thier own > > >uniquely intelligent sound and feel. Thanks in advance. > > > > not a big fan but like them. I'd rather put them under easy listening. > > but the gentle people are also there and so is IDM. > > Don't they remind you of some french progressive rock group? It can be > said of a lot of groups discussed in this list that they are 90's prog > rock... I would say bullshit.. but stereolab is just a little to flakey.. > Its like we're back to the nonsensical 70s where lyrics like: > > "Close to the edge, down by the corner!" > > are not the utter play on the ambiguity of language that they seem in the > 90s. > > M >