179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Darshan M. Jesrani
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:55:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject:
Re: Hardkiss
Msg-Id:
<01HSV8FEBRH8A4L9A4@CENTER.COLGATE.EDU>
Mbox:
idm.9507.gz
quoted 9 lines e-wanna-b-so-ambient-danse-all-e-kan-do-iz-lame-o-dronez-with-thee-same-ol>> >e-wanna-b-so-ambient-danse-all-e-kan-do-iz-lame-o-dronez-with-thee-same-ol >> >d-boring-noizez-and-samplez-and-have-everything-b-so-damned-predictable. >> >.... it's either: a) hooked-on-phonics isn't as good as they claim... > or... b)this is the work of a brilliant neo-deconstructivist >--------------------------------------------------------------- >It's not that we can't *understand* what anontrav's saying, >right? It's just somewhat annoying to have to decode. `e' means `he'; >`z' = `s'; `b' = `be.' Quite simple, no?
quoted 1 line cathy <Curtis@news.latimes.com>>cathy <Curtis@news.latimes.com>
ooooh! nasty nasty! i get the feeling all of you understood quite clearly what he was trying to say. let's not be little and belittle. i haven't been liking hardkiss's recent tracks either - at least, the ones which appear on the trance atlantic 2CD - i don't know what's up with them, having produced that hawke record (esp. _3 moods.._) that i like so much. whatever. peace, darshan ps. oh yeah, is their new shit any better than those trance atlantic tracks?