179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: eat static implant (an a

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-08-04 17:40Jon Drukman Re: eat static implant (an a
└─ 1994-08-04 16:52Jeff Taylor Re: eat static implant (an a
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-08-04 17:40Jon DrukmanRE>eat static implant (an alternativ >Eat Static _Implant_ (planet dog) >Perhaps I am miss
From:
Jon Drukman
To:
IDM
Date:
Thu, 4 Aug 1994 10:40:59 PDT
Subject:
Re: eat static implant (an a
permalink · <00654.2858842041.668@opcode.com>
RE>eat static implant (an alternativ
quoted 1 line Eat Static _Implant_ (planet dog)>Eat Static _Implant_ (planet dog)
quoted 5 lines Perhaps I am missing the point here but, the tracks on a whole>Perhaps I am missing the point here but, the tracks on a whole >sound quite unmelodic and just plain noisy. Each *song* telegraphs >in stiff simplicity. Acid by numbers. Dare I call it formula trance? >YES! >Minimal DOES NOT have to mean motionless.
much as it pains me to disagree with teep (and i know you won't take this personally, given that we agree on pretty much everything else), i just have to rush to the defense here. i just can't see a track like "survivors" as "acid by numbers" or "motionless"... in fact, i think it's easily one of the most innovative tracks i've heard all year. and it does go through some wild mutations before busting out into one of the all time feel good dance climaxes. trance? i don't think so. ok, granted the title track and dzhopa dream are more on the typical trancedance tip but everything else on the album more than makes up for it. i just can't say it strongly enough: this album is 2nd only to Future Sound Of London in my Top 10 of the year. i've been listening to it continuously since it arrived. fifteen thumbs up. /jon
1994-08-04 16:52Jeff TaylorAgreed. Five more thumbs from me. I have to say that Eat Static are trancy, but not in the
From:
Jeff Taylor
To:
Jon Drukman
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 4 Aug 1994 16:52:17 -40962758 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: eat static implant (an a
Reply to:
Re: eat static implant (an a
permalink · <m0qWCa9-000GfCC@ramona.cyborganic.com>
Agreed. Five more thumbs from me. I have to say that Eat Static are trancy, but not in the 'typical' way. I think that the arrangements are trancy, but the music is freaky. Mushroomy. I don't really know how to put a label on it. Their music is trippy and surreal. Teep. Try it out on Acid. Then tell me what you think. I'm really into the track that starts off the CD.. (though I can't seem to remember the name of the track) Brilliant. \jeff
quoted 7 lines i just can't say it strongly enough: this album is 2nd only to Future Sound> i just can't say it strongly enough: this album is 2nd only to Future Sound > Of London in my Top 10 of the year. i've been listening to it continuously > since it arrived. fifteen thumbs up. > > /jon > >