179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: ArtI 2 Vid

4 messages · 4 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-06-14 14:08darko ArtI 2 Vid
└─ 1994-06-14 15:33CiM Re: ArtI 2 Vid
1994-06-14 15:23ArtI 2 Vid
1994-06-15 05:01Re: ArtI 2 Vid
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-06-14 14:08darkoAnyone seen the ArtI 2 Vid yet? To say its amazing might be a bit of an understatement (ye
From:
darko
To:
Date:
Tue, 14 Jun 94 15:08:55 BST
Subject:
ArtI 2 Vid
permalink · <"14_Jun_94_15:08:55_BST_#7976"@UK.AC.BHAM.IBM3090>
Anyone seen the ArtI 2 Vid yet? To say its amazing might be a bit of an understatement (yes I know this is more WARP hype, totally unnecessary and probably tedious, but there you go). I think it features about 5 short 10 min film-type-computer-animation-mad-thing-on-your-screen things, and each one is pretty amazing. I wont say too much about each of them cos it would take ages. The first one, "Nanotechnics" features "Utuba" by Beaumont Hannant, and features stuff like floating globules of milk or something. I swear its got something to do with the inner ear, flying into the eartubes maybe. LIke the rest of the films, its all a bit unclear. The second one (name evades me) features music from Richard H Kirk and Polygon Window, and is all about the man from the ArtI 1 LP cover wandering into a picture on the wall, walking thru a desert, and the like. This is the best one, called "Posthumous Porpoise somethingorother" (the professionalism of this review, wow....), features what looks like zebra porpoises swimming inside a jaguar, which changes to a zebra, and so on. Its a very claustrophobic piece, this one, as opposed to the 2nd which is very agoraphobic, and at times its unclear which is the jaguar background and which is the dolphin, they kind of melt into each other. (Pause to realise I cant remember anything of the fourth film, but I assure you its as good as the rest) The fifth one is the one from which you may have seen stills: a kind of eight legged beetle thing that constantly changes colour, clinging onto some rocks that seem to have eyes. Very freaky. The music is Autechre's "Basscadet" and it really suits the piece well. Some of the earlier pieces didnt really suit the films, especially the second film....the beaumont hannant track wouldve been a lot better there. All in all, well worth buying, the only problem was I felt they couldve taken it much, MUCH, further. Each film kind of faded in what seemed mid flow, and finished just when you were getting into it. I think only in the third film did they really explore what they had created on the screen (I wouldve loved to have known what was at the end of the tunnel in the first film), and maybe a few more digitised images rather than pure generations wouldve made this a lot better. In each case, it was pure animation, with no sign of human interaction, and to have these images go along with music billed as "electronic music that can be lsitened to {and interacted with, I guess}", well I guess I just felt the music had more character. I found myself just accepting the music and being amazed at the images, like isnt that great what a computer can do, when maybe I shouldve been thinking about the people behind it (subtext there: maybe if they made the environment they had created *more* alien, yet more human at the same time (ie weirder but with interactions) it couldve blown my mind. Well, they say it was the first in a series of ArtI vids, so, who knows. As an experiment, pretty godlike, but I wanted it to blow my mind. darko... I hate this text editor....
1994-06-14 15:33CiMOn Tue, 14 Jun 1994, darko wrote: [...] > Well, they say it was the first in a series of A
From:
CiM
To:
darko
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 14 Jun 1994 16:33:17 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: ArtI 2 Vid
Reply to:
ArtI 2 Vid
permalink · <Pine.3.87.9406141617.A11645-0100000@oxygen.sys.uea.ac.uk>
On Tue, 14 Jun 1994, darko wrote: [...]
quoted 2 lines Well, they say it was the first in a series of ArtI vids, so, who knows.> Well, they say it was the first in a series of ArtI vids, so, who knows. > As an experiment, pretty godlike, but I wanted it to blow my mind.
Yeah, I saw it too but it was just running on a monitor; I couldn't see any videos on the shelves. Overall, it seemed pretty damn good; lots of visual wow factor tho' as opposed to the music and visuals working together. The only thing that bugged me was that the frame rate seemed just a wee bit too slow. That might've been the video system though as Virgin like to run advertisements, etc. over the top. I'll probably buy it anyway, being the victim of Warp-hype that I am. [CiM]
1994-06-14 15:23Alexis.Richardson@comlab.oxford.ac.ukI switched on MTV a couple of weeks ago and: lo and behold - a series of AI2 videos. Flyin
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 14 Jun 94 16:23:11 BST
Subject:
ArtI 2 Vid
permalink · <9406141523.AA19210@eve.comlab.ox.ac.uk>
I switched on MTV a couple of weeks ago and: lo and behold - a series of AI2 videos. Flying porposises were being gobbled by tentacled things in a desperate attempt to hold your attention. It was fun but could have been much better. I realise that this art-form has miles to go yet and it was all very encouraging but the end result was a visual backdrop which would have been at home on a huge screen in a cafe, imho. (by the way it was mtv Europe, Thursday night just before midnight BST) alexis 
1994-06-15 05:01transmat@teleport.comAlexis.Richardson wrote >I switched on MTV a couple of weeks ago and: lo and behold - a se
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 14 Jun 1994 21:01:42 -0800
Subject:
Re: ArtI 2 Vid
permalink · <199406150352.UAA27365@teleport.com>
Alexis.Richardson wrote
quoted 7 lines I switched on MTV a couple of weeks ago and: lo and behold - a series>I switched on MTV a couple of weeks ago and: lo and behold - a series >of AI2 videos. Flying porposises were being gobbled by tentacled things >in a desperate attempt to hold your attention. It was fun but could >have been much better. I realise that this art-form has miles to go >yet and it was all very encouraging but the end result was a visual >backdrop which would have been at home on a huge screen in a cafe, imho. >(by the way it was mtv Europe, Thursday night just before midnight BST)
Lucky, you all. All MTV shows in the states is crappy rock vids, though once they showed the vid for "One." time...space...transmat@teleport.com bleep on!