179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

re: lfo

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-05-18 14:15multipara re: lfo
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-05-18 14:15multiparaon wed, 18 may 1994 10:46:43 +0200 (eet), JOUNI ALKIO <JOUNI@shh.fi> wrote: >LFO >played t
From:
multipara
To:
Date:
Wed, 18 May 1994 15:15:46 +0100
Subject:
re: lfo
permalink · <"mailhub.uni-:099260:940518131204"@uni-konstanz.de>
on wed, 18 may 1994 10:46:43 +0200 (eet), JOUNI ALKIO <JOUNI@shh.fi> wrote:
quoted 5 lines LFO>LFO >played totally >unrecognizable material which was lightyears from their recorded >stuff. It was almost like "rave" techno. Fast, monotonous, boring, >stupid.
quoted 8 lines There were 2 guys from Air Liquide>There were 2 guys from Air Liquide >(supposedly playing live but I didn't notice anything special) and >german DJ's Electric Indigo an DJ Hell. What a disappointment this >again. I thought they should have played AMBIENT or at least >intelligent techno. But they played that usual bread-and-butter thump- >thump-thump "party" techno almost all the time. [snip] Well, perhaps >they weren't responsible for the style. Could be somebody had told >them to play this kind of music. Who knows...
couldn't it be the case that some people actually *like* fast bread and butter thump thump thump? i must say that for the guys from air liquide (promised reviews forthcoming) i like their harder material best (btw one of them is half finnish, so there's hardly reason to think that they think the finnish are dumb). as for lfo: do you know the lfo wap 5 single? what do you think of "probe"? well maybe the stuff they all did *was* bad. but it sure can't be bad just because you can jump around to it? peace, p.