IDM Mailing Archive

1994-04-07 15:10Steven KimHelp! I know the track listing for Orbital's "Diversions" was posted just the other day, b

From:: Steven Kim <stevekim@casbah.acns.nwu.edu>
To:: IDM list <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Thu, 7 Apr 1994 10:10:24 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:: Diversions?

Help! I know the track listing for Orbital's "Diversions" was posted just the other day, but I seem to have dumped it into a bottomless chuckhole in the information superhighway... Could some kind soul please post it again? I am wondering what I might miss or gain by getting the Lush+remixes EP and the Peel Sessions. tanxx, steve -- Steve Kim, stevekim@casbah.acns.nwu.edu

1994-04-27 19:05IanHas orbital's diversion ep been released on vinyl? Or is it CD only? Thanks, Ian

From:: Ian <shredder@ai.mit.edu>
To:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Wed, 27 Apr 94 15:05:18 EDT
Subject:: diversions?

Has orbital's diversion ep been released on vinyl? Or is it CD only? Thanks, Ian

1994-04-27 21:59Matthew CorwineOn Wed, 27 Apr 1994, Ian wrote: > > Has orbital's diversion ep been released on vinyl? Or

From:: Matthew Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu>
To:: Ian <shredder@ai.mit.edu>
Cc:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 14:59:06 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:: Re: diversions?
Reply to:: diversions?

On Wed, 27 Apr 1994, Ian wrote:

quoted 2 lines Has orbital's diversion ep been released on vinyl? Or is it CD only?

> > Has orbital's diversion ep been released on vinyl? Or is it CD only?

I doubt it. We only got cassette and CD copies in the mail, and the whole concept of Diversions is a bit like the Plastikman re-release collection, an opportunity for home listeners to get the same tracks once only available on vinyl. Releasing it on vinyl is rather redundant (although I see how it might be beneficial for those who missed the tracks the first time around)...Plently of Impact USA/Lush 1914 promos went out a few months ago, and I have seen quite a few turn up in the used bins and I'm sure you could find them there. Also the Peel Sessions came out on vinyl in the UK, so you can probably accumulate the tracks rather easily... Peace, Matt XLR8R Magazine, Seattle

1994-04-28 00:19C. David Holloway> ...Plently of Impact USA/Lush 1914 promos > went out a few months ago, and I have seen q

From:: C. David Holloway <cdh1@Ra.MsState.Edu>
To:: Matthew Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu>
Cc:: Ian <shredder@ai.mit.edu>, <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 19:19:16 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:: Re: diversions?
Reply to:: Re: diversions?

quoted 5 lines ...Plently of Impact USA/Lush 1914 promos

> ...Plently of Impact USA/Lush 1914 promos > went out a few months ago, and I have seen quite a few turn up in the > used bins and I'm sure you could find them there. Also the Peel Sessions > came out on vinyl in the UK, so you can probably accumulate the tracks > rather easily...

Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926 Trancendance mix? Also on the Peel Sessions, are Lush and Walk About separate tracks or are they mixed together like Diversions? Dave cdh1@ra.msstate.edu ...or you can call him Dave the Rave. ...or you can even call him Technodave. ...but don't call him discodave!!!

1994-04-28 01:42Matthew CorwineOn Wed, 27 Apr 1994, C. David Holloway wrote: > Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926

From:: Matthew Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu>
To:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 18:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:: Re: diversions?
Reply to:: Re: diversions?

On Wed, 27 Apr 1994, C. David Holloway wrote:

quoted 3 lines Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926 Trancendance mix?

> Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926 Trancendance mix? > Also on the Peel Sessions, are Lush and Walk About separate tracks or are > they mixed together like Diversions?

No, I just have a shitty memory. I wasn't in the office when I typed that... It is the 1926 trancedance mix... And I don't have a copy of the Peel Sessions so I really can't tell you, sorry (and I don't feel like making another stupid stab at it :-)) Peace, Matt XLR8R Magazine, Seattle <xlr8r@eskimo.com>

1994-04-28 12:35Roy Badami> > Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926 Trancendance mix? > > Also on the Peel Sess

From:: Roy Badami <roy@harlequin.co.uk>
To:: Matthew Corwine <mcorwine@u.washington.edu>
Cc:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Thu, 28 Apr 1994 13:35:03 +0100
Subject:: Re: diversions?
Reply to:: Re: diversions?

quoted 3 lines Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926 Trancendance mix?

> > Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926 Trancendance mix? > > Also on the Peel Sessions, are Lush and Walk About separate tracks or are > > they mixed together like Diversions?

Yes, both sides of the Peel session 12" are mixed. Cosmic

1994-04-28 02:24Chris.HilkerThe world according to C. David Holloway: > >> ...Plently of Impact USA/Lush 1914 promos >

From:: Chris.Hilker <cspot@netcom.com>
To:: C. David Holloway <cdh1@ra.msstate.edu>
Cc:: <mcorwine@u.washington.edu>, <shredder@ai.mit.edu>, <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 19:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:: Re: diversions?
Reply to:: Re: diversions?

The world according to C. David Holloway:

quoted 10 lines ...Plently of Impact USA/Lush 1914 promos

> >> ...Plently of Impact USA/Lush 1914 promos >> went out a few months ago, and I have seen quite a few turn up in the >> used bins and I'm sure you could find them there. Also the Peel Sessions >> came out on vinyl in the UK, so you can probably accumulate the tracks >> rather easily... > >Is that Lush 1914 different from Lush 1926 Trancendance mix? >Also on the Peel Sessions, are Lush and Walk About separate tracks or are >they mixed together like Diversions?

HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO WE HAVE TO GO OVER THIS? Peel Session is four tracks. All of them track seperately. C. -- (Puevf.Uvyxre) pfcbg@argpbz.pbz

1994-04-28 02:44John SweeneyIn a dream, these words by Chris.Hilker were imprinted on my mind: > > HOW MANY FUCKING TI

From:: John Sweeney <jds@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>
To:: <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Wed, 27 Apr 1994 22:44:40 -0400
Subject:: Re: diversions?
Reply to:: Re: diversions?

In a dream, these words by Chris.Hilker were imprinted on my mind:

quoted 3 lines HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO WE HAVE TO GO OVER THIS?

> > HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO WE HAVE TO GO OVER THIS? >

you know...i think i saw an orbital mailing list somewhere a while back. i dunno if it still exists, but if it does, then maybe this should be discussed there. just a thought =) harmon-e ---- john sweeney jds@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu binary sound(imprints)

1994-04-28 12:36Roy Badami> Peel Session is four tracks. All of them track seperately. Well, my 12" of Peel Session

From:: Roy Badami <roy@harlequin.co.uk>
To:: Chris.Hilker <cspot@netcom.com>
Cc:: C. David Holloway <cdh1@ra.msstate.edu>, <mcorwine@u.washington.edu>, <shredder@ai.mit.edu>, <idm@techno.Stanford.EDU>
Date:: Thu, 28 Apr 1994 13:36:52 +0100
Subject:: Re: diversions?
Reply to:: Re: diversions?

quoted 1 line Peel Session is four tracks. All of them track seperately.

> Peel Session is four tracks. All of them track seperately.

Well, my 12" of Peel Session (UK release on Internal) has the tracks segued together (rather well, IMHO). That is, Lush runs into Walk About on the A side, and Semi-Detached runs into Attatched on the B side.... Cosmic

Re: diversions?