179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: Creem -- HAA-HAA!!!

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1994-04-05 07:41c. bailey Creem -- HAA-HAA!!!
└─ 1994-04-05 16:44Jon Drukman Re: Creem -- HAA-HAA!!!
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1994-04-05 07:41c. baileyWoah boy!!! If anyone was worried about techno going mainstream (heh heh) then check out t
From:
c. bailey
To:
idm
Cc:
Tosh Cooey , Nadim Khan
Date:
Tue, 5 Apr 1994 03:41:11 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Creem -- HAA-HAA!!!
permalink · <Pine.3.88.9404050317.A8424-0100000@julian.uwo.ca>
Woah boy!!! If anyone was worried about techno going mainstream (heh heh) then check out the May issue of Creem Magazine. This one tops them all for a good laugh. The article, "Tech-noid" (cool name, huh?) written by the omniscient Tony Fletcher, is so-o-o-o-o-o bad I didn't even want to waste a stamp writing a letter to the editor. Get this: "...Unfortunately, after stellar releases by Polygon Window, Fuse (gee, I always thought it was F.U.S.E.), B-12 (not B12?!?), and Black Dog (don'cha mean Black Dog *Productions*?), the newest album in the series, "Incunabula" by Autechre finally reveals the shortcomings of the genre.(*WHAT*?!?!?) Instead of providing "electronic listening music", Autechre gives us electronic background muzak (yes! he really wrote this!); none of Incunabula's moments of gentle charm and delicate intrigue come anywhere close to the English duo's proposed "Melodic industrial soundtracks for futuristic horror movies". AAAARRRGH!!! -- this was my first reaction. Then I kept reading: "Part of Autechre's problem (drop jaw here.) is that it falls into the vast void between techno and ambient, neither hard enough for the dancefloor nor soft enough to chill out to." I *SAW* and *HEARD* Autechre play live at a rave in Toronto where they blew me and everyone else in the place away, and I have their CD, and I *know* that they are one of the best groups out there. Anyway, it didn't take me too too long to console myself. The rest of the article is almost as bad. But you know what, I'm glad that Cream and other big magazines like it don't know shit about techno. Like Tony Felcher said (one of the only things he got right): "Techno has not actually swept the mainstream (no thanks to you, buddy) --but that, most of the music's producers and the culture's participants agree, is possibly the best thing that could have happened to it." If you want my advice, don't buy the magazine, just rip out the two pages (mostly for the three-column interview with R.James) and pin them up on your bulletin board. And everytime you feel like maybe you don't really know anything about techno after all (is it just me?) read this article and reassure yourself that compared to the rest of the world (the people magazines like Creme are marketed _at_) you are a _part_ of the movement. After all, you subscribe to IDM. Crispin -----
1994-04-05 16:44Jon Drukman> "Part of Autechre's problem (drop jaw here.) is that it falls >into the vast void betwee
From:
Jon Drukman
To:
Date:
Tue, 5 Apr 94 09:44:10 PDT
Subject:
Re: Creem -- HAA-HAA!!!
Reply to:
Creem -- HAA-HAA!!!
permalink · <9404051644.AA20900@dlsun87.us.oracle.com>
quoted 3 lines "Part of Autechre's problem (drop jaw here.) is that it falls> "Part of Autechre's problem (drop jaw here.) is that it falls >into the vast void between techno and ambient, neither hard enough for >the dancefloor nor soft enough to chill out to."
Creem's only sin is that they are about a year late with that observation. I myself have leveled it many times at the Warp AI series. But let's not rehash that argument all over again... Jon Drukman jdrukman%dlsun87@oracle.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence.