quoted 19 lines I agree completely - I think that the vast majority of what would be con-
> I agree completely - I think that the vast majority of what would be con-
>sidered IDM lacks the ability to make me feel anything. I don't know if this
>holds true for the rest of you (think about it, and post), but much of this
>music doesn't move me emotionally (or physically, since IDM's style seems to
>be typified by de-emphasized percussion). Don't get me wrong - I don't mean
>that the music should dictate any sort of 'emotion' to the listener (via
>sappy, cheesy, sad string melodies or any other shit like that), but should
>act in such a way that the listener is affected emotionally in some way or
>another (even if it's extremely subtle).
>
> I just think that the subject matter of the music should be bigger than that
>which was used to produce it, namely electronics and electronic musical
>instruments. I don't really want to hear music about electronics, know what
>I mean?
>
> Darshan
>
>
>
The first time(and well hundreds of times since) Stella did it for me. I
have an intense reaction to the song...i can't expalain but the fact that
it triggers something in me says a lot for the transcribers of such a
piece...same for the 'spaceship melody'(i think that's what its called)
from the earthrise cd, and some spacetime continuum...the sounds must must
be speaking to something else....
A track has to be more than just sound good to me, be more than just kinda
cool, it has to evoke something for me to praise it...if the song can bring
feelings to the surface that's the mark of genius imho
quoted 3 lines Remember, music is an art, not a science (did I really say that?!?)
> Remember, music is an art, not a science (did I really say that?!?)
>Brendan Nelson
>Lost Transmission From Cowley
*EXACTLY*, don't lose sight of this.....
________________________________q________________r_____i___s________/
qris blohm(kblohm@cln.etc.bc.ca)