IDM Mailing Archive

1993-11-11 12:04(Chris.Hilker)The Rickster <john4692@mach1.wlu.ca> writes: >Apparently, as I have been told by a reputib

From:: (Chris.Hilker) <cspot@cats.ucsc.edu>
Date:: Thu, 11 Nov 93 12:04:17 +45722724
Subject:: Re: REVIEW: Black Dog - Temple of Transparent Balls

The Rickster <john4692@mach1.wlu.ca> writes:

quoted 3 lines Apparently, as I have been told by a reputible source, the Black Dog

>Apparently, as I have been told by a reputible source, the Black Dog >Productions lp 'Bytes' wasn't just Black Dog, but a whol bunchapeople from >the BDP folds.

Like KRS-1? :)

quoted 4 lines The bands are actually listed on the CD after the track,

>The bands are actually listed on the CD after the track, >that's why the CD at first glance seems to be 18 tracks long, when it's >only 11. It's a compilation is what I'm trying to get around to saying, so >the actual Black Dog lp may sound rather different.

This isn't true. It's as much a compilation as 'Transmitting from Heaven' or 'Instinct Dance' is. Otherwise, why would the track called "Carceres ex Novum" by Xeper on 'Bytes' be credited as "Xeper! (Remix)" by Black Dog on the 'Trance Europe Express' compilation? The tracking is goofy because the "Phil (x)" tracks (credited to Echo Mike) are tracked with the longer tracks (which annoys me to no end). The use of pseudonyms is nothing new in dance music. There are only three guys in Black Dog Productions, which, if I'm counting right, makes seven possible combinations. There are eight "groups" credited on 'Bytes' (Atypic, Balil, Close Up Over, Discordian Popes, Echo Mike, I.A.O, Plaid, and Xeper), which leads me to believe that the group names don't even represent differing lineups within the band. Your "reputible source" has been hoodwinked. C. -- (chris.hilker) cspot@cats.ucsc.edu "For your information, you mindless twit, I am not a his/her." - Ashima Saigal (asaig@ctp.com)

1993-11-11 18:06The RicksterApparently, as I have been told by a reputible source, the Black Dog Productions lp 'Bytes

From:: The Rickster <john4692@mach1.wlu.ca>
Date:: Thu, 11 Nov 1993 14:06:26 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:: Re: REVIEW: Black Dog - Temple of Transparent Balls

Apparently, as I have been told by a reputible source, the Black Dog Productions lp 'Bytes' wasn't just Black Dog, but a whol bunchapeople from the BDP folds. The bands are actually listed on the CD after the track, that's why the CD at first glance seems to be 18 tracks long, when it's only 11. It's a compilation is what I'm trying to get around to saying, so the actual Black Dog lp may sound rather different. - Richard. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |Richard John There's an all night party |john4692@mach1.wlu.ca In room 7609 -Late Bar ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DI-L8 YOUR MIND!

1993-11-11 19:20Ian WoodhouseOn Thu, 11 Nov 1993, The Rickster wrote: > Apparently, as I have been told by a reputible

From:: Ian Woodhouse <john6920@mach1.wlu.ca>
Date:: Thu, 11 Nov 1993 15:20:31 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:: Re: REVIEW: Black Dog - Temple of Transparent Balls

On Thu, 11 Nov 1993, The Rickster wrote:

quoted 8 lines Apparently, as I have been told by a reputible source, the Black Dog

> Apparently, as I have been told by a reputible source, the Black Dog > Productions lp 'Bytes' wasn't just Black Dog, but a whol bunchapeople from > the BDP folds. The bands are actually listed on the CD after the track, > that's why the CD at first glance seems to be 18 tracks long, when it's > only 11. It's a compilation is what I'm trying to get around to saying, so > the actual Black Dog lp may sound rather different. > > - Richard.

From what I recall, the 'Bytes' album DID have 18 tracks. 11 songs and 7 From: ??? Date: ??? Subject: ??? Status: Ian Woodhouse (john6920@mach1.wlu.ca)

Re: REVIEW: Black Dog - Temple of Transparent Balls