179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] www.richard-devine.com

7 messages · 7 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
2004-08-04 04:31PR [idm] www.richard-devine.com
└─ 2004-08-04 08:26muffin Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
2004-08-04 09:24Sam Aaron Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
└─ 2004-08-04 12:51Glenn McClements Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
2004-08-04 14:06Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
└─ 2004-08-04 16:03Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
└─ 2004-08-04 20:51Brodie Chree Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2004-08-04 04:31PRNew RICHARD DEVINE site just went live: http://www.richard-devine.com Pietro. //-- Pietrob
From:
PR
To:
, , , , , , , , , , ,
Date:
Tue, 03 Aug 2004 21:31:28 -0700
Subject:
[idm] www.richard-devine.com
permalink · <6.1.2.0.2.20040803213107.01e57880@mail.digitalnimbus.com>
New RICHARD DEVINE site just went live: http://www.richard-devine.com Pietro. //-- Pietrobot || http://pietrobot.com :: Electronic Music Exposure :: PO Box 443, Orange CA 92856 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-08-04 08:26muffinRequires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high methinks. 75% of we
From:
muffin
To:
i'd do mary
Date:
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:26:10 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
Reply to:
[idm] www.richard-devine.com
permalink · <F07040F7-E5EF-11D8-A2D3-000A95D0D70C@signmytits.com>
Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high methinks. 75% of web users have either 1024x768 or 800x600 screens IIRC. On 4 Aug 2004, at 05:31, PR wrote:
quoted 19 lines New RICHARD DEVINE site just went live:> New RICHARD DEVINE site just went live: > > http://www.richard-devine.com > > Pietro. > > //-- > Pietrobot || http://pietrobot.com :: > Electronic Music Exposure :: > PO Box 443, Orange CA 92856 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-08-04 09:24Sam AaronOn 4 Aug 2004, at 9:28 am, muffin wrote: > Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising th
From:
Sam Aaron
To:
Date:
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:24:51 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
permalink · <2392E1E2-E5F8-11D8-B785-000A95A8F230@ncl.ac.uk>
On 4 Aug 2004, at 9:28 am, muffin wrote:
quoted 4 lines Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high> Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high > methinks. 75% of web users have either 1024x768 or 800x600 screens > IIRC. >
And what a fiddle it is to use too! Looks like the poor chap is trying too hard... Sam Aaron PhD Student School of Computing Science University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-08-04 12:51Glenn McClementsMy oh my, is it nice though..... > > On 4 Aug 2004, at 9:28 am, muffin wrote: > >> Require
From:
Glenn McClements
To:
Sam Aaron
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:51:27 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
Reply to:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
permalink · <4110DBCF.8020608@openwave.com>
My oh my, is it nice though.....
quoted 21 lines On 4 Aug 2004, at 9:28 am, muffin wrote:> > On 4 Aug 2004, at 9:28 am, muffin wrote: > >> Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high >> methinks. 75% of web users have either 1024x768 or 800x600 screens >> IIRC. >> > > And what a fiddle it is to use too! Looks like the poor chap is trying > too hard... > > Sam Aaron > PhD Student > School of Computing Science > University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-08-04 14:06DavidASim@aol.com>>> Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high >>> methinks. 7
From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:06:33 EDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
permalink · <d8.10ee4389.2e424769@aol.com>
quoted 7 lines Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high>>> Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high >>> methinks. 75% of web users have either 1024x768 or 800x600 screens >>> IIRC. >> >> And what a fiddle it is to use too! Looks like the poor chap is trying >> too hard... > My oh my, is it nice though.....
It's very pretty, and unusually for a pretty website, has good content, but it's a little tough on those of us who live in the countryside and don't yet have even the option of broadband. Does there exist an alternative version written in Notepad in case plebs, rustics and Lynx fundamentalists want to know what he's up to too? On a similar note, could anyone explain the Warp website? The recent Warp thread made me realise a) that I'm beginning to think of Warp as an elitist clique whose operatives put out precise, impersonal music with no real energy or enthusiasm for what they're doing and b) that they aren't. As far as I can tell, they're passionate, committed and friendly people, with vast enthusiasm for the interesting and varied music they're putting out. But they have a grim khaki website, which I think is mostly responsible for the bad vibes I was getting. Is this just me being far too impressionable? David ps sorry if this comes across as a troll: it's not meant to be, I am genuinely interested to know whether I'm the only person who doesn't like that olive-green nightmare.
2004-08-04 16:03btallent@gmail.comI normally find flash websites (including the new Richard Devine site) annoying, but for s
From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:03:29 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
Reply to:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
permalink · <1016696d0408040903591c2e8a@mail.gmail.com>
I normally find flash websites (including the new Richard Devine site) annoying, but for some reason I like the warp site. Maybe it's the hypnotizing logo or the little drawbar navigation at the bottom. On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:06:33 EDT, davidasim@aol.com <davidasim@aol.com> wrote:
quoted 29 lines Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high> >>> Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high > >>> methinks. 75% of web users have either 1024x768 or 800x600 screens > >>> IIRC. > >> > >> And what a fiddle it is to use too! Looks like the poor chap is trying > >> too hard... > > My oh my, is it nice though..... > > It's very pretty, and unusually for a pretty website, has good content, but > it's a little tough on those of us who live in the countryside and don't yet > have even the option of broadband. Does there exist an alternative version > written in Notepad in case plebs, rustics and Lynx fundamentalists want to know > what he's up to too? > > On a similar note, could anyone explain the Warp website? The recent Warp > thread made me realise a) that I'm beginning to think of Warp as an elitist > clique whose operatives put out precise, impersonal music with no real energy or > enthusiasm for what they're doing and b) that they aren't. As far as I can tell, > they're passionate, committed and friendly people, with vast enthusiasm for > the interesting and varied music they're putting out. But they have a grim > khaki website, which I think is mostly responsible for the bad vibes I was > getting. Is this just me being far too impressionable? > > David > > ps sorry if this comes across as a troll: it's not meant to be, I am > genuinely interested to know whether I'm the only person who doesn't like that > olive-green nightmare. >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2004-08-04 20:51Brodie ChreeThe Warp Recods site also isn't programmed entirely in flash. The useful bits are mostly H
From:
Brodie Chree
To:
btallent@gmail.com
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 4 Aug 2004 16:51:46 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
Reply to:
Re: [idm] www.richard-devine.com
permalink · <af3d55f304080413513afdf8a2@mail.gmail.com>
The Warp Recods site also isn't programmed entirely in flash. The useful bits are mostly HTML. On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 09:03:29 -0700, btallent@gmail.com <btallent@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 43 lines I normally find flash websites (including the new Richard Devine site)> I normally find flash websites (including the new Richard Devine site) > annoying, but for some reason I like the warp site. Maybe it's the > hypnotizing logo or the little drawbar navigation at the bottom. > > > > > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 10:06:33 EDT, davidasim@aol.com <davidasim@aol.com> wrote: > > >>> Requires 1280x1240 screen ... that's raising the bar a little too high > > >>> methinks. 75% of web users have either 1024x768 or 800x600 screens > > >>> IIRC. > > >> > > >> And what a fiddle it is to use too! Looks like the poor chap is trying > > >> too hard... > > > My oh my, is it nice though..... > > > > It's very pretty, and unusually for a pretty website, has good content, but > > it's a little tough on those of us who live in the countryside and don't yet > > have even the option of broadband. Does there exist an alternative version > > written in Notepad in case plebs, rustics and Lynx fundamentalists want to know > > what he's up to too? > > > > On a similar note, could anyone explain the Warp website? The recent Warp > > thread made me realise a) that I'm beginning to think of Warp as an elitist > > clique whose operatives put out precise, impersonal music with no real energy or > > enthusiasm for what they're doing and b) that they aren't. As far as I can tell, > > they're passionate, committed and friendly people, with vast enthusiasm for > > the interesting and varied music they're putting out. But they have a grim > > khaki website, which I think is mostly responsible for the bad vibes I was > > getting. Is this just me being far too impressionable? > > > > David > > > > ps sorry if this comes across as a troll: it's not meant to be, I am > > genuinely interested to know whether I'm the only person who doesn't like that > > olive-green nightmare. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org