179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

[idm] label focus and the test of time

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2004-07-20 15:27chthonic streams [idm] label focus and the test of time
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2004-07-20 15:27chthonic streams> >FOETUS was on play it again sam, waxtrax in the US. FLA was >also on wax > >trax and po
From:
chthonic streams
To:
Date:
Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:27:03 -0400
Subject:
[idm] label focus and the test of time
permalink · <p05210609bd22e8920fc2@[64.63.223.81]>
quoted 9 lines FOETUS was on play it again sam, waxtrax in the US. FLA was> >FOETUS was on play it again sam, waxtrax in the US. FLA was >also on wax > >trax and possibly other labels but not cleopatra or >invisible. SMG was signed to > >wax trax after it got bought by TVT. most of the others are >licensed from foreign > >labels (like leaetherstrip) > > Whatever. That's not my point.
kay. was just setting the record striaght as it were about the labels those bands were on.
quoted 12 lines My point is that no matter what the year and no matter what the>My point is that no matter what the year and no matter what the >label (Warp included), 5 or 10 years out we're all gonna look back >and say 'O my god, I don't believe I liked some of that stuff.' It >is absolutely gauranteed and inevitable. It should be- it's the >natural progression of music and musical styles. > Sure, some of it will stand the test of time, like the AI >comps and Tri Repetae and a bunch of others, but (as has been >mentioned already in this thread), when you have a percepted bastion >of a certain musical style (as Warp was to idm originally), over the >years that label's output as it becomes more varied and diverse, >people will see that as them becoming dilluted or not as >progreessive as they used to be.
yep. makes sense. it's all perception anyway. one person's dilution is another's proression.
quoted 6 lines It happened to all those labels in the 90s; it's happening to> It happened to all those labels in the 90s; it's happening to >Warp now, and it'll happen to every simgle label in existence. It's >unavoidable. > And yes, I sincerely hope that in 10 years I can look back at >all these tunes that I'm loving today and think 'I can't believe I >used to like that stuff.'
i can believe i used to like the stuff i did. and some i still like, i've just had enough of listening to it. it's more the stuff that i got at the same time that i can't believe i bought. like, yes, emperor and burzum were good black metal bands...but the other 20 or so BM CDs i got were just more of the same and not as good, and i wonder why i didn't see that at the time. i guess i will see that in the future with some of the less stellar IDM.
quoted 3 lines Sidenote- I can't believe that in my earlier post I forgot to> Sidenote- I can't believe that in my earlier post I forgot to >mention the first two Download cds on Cleo and the Phylr albums on >Invisible. Very much worth mentioning.
'the eyes of stanley pain' was good, yeah. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org