179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: [idm] Re: fusion clarification

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
2004-03-01 13:30chthonic Re: [idm] Re: fusion clarification
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2004-03-01 13:30chthonic---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: theREALmxyzptlk <theR
From:
chthonic
To:
Date:
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 05:30:28 -0800
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: fusion clarification
permalink · <200403010530.AA216991364@chthonicstreams.com>
---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: theREALmxyzptlk <theREALmxyzptlk@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 04:08:34 -0500
quoted 1 line fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a>>fusion is a word that's already been used long ago to describe a
certain
quoted 1 line type of groove-based jazz-rock. it differs from prog in that prog>>type of groove-based jazz-rock. it differs from prog in that prog
seems
quoted 1 line to have longer and multi-part song structures and has an>>to have longer and multi-part song structures and has an
emphasis on
quoted 1 line classical scales and modes, through there's sometimes jazz>>classical scales and modes, through there's sometimes jazz
thrown in as
quoted 1 line well.>>well.
quoted 2 lines More than "sometimes jazz>More than "sometimes jazz >thrown in", the category was mainly a fusion between jazz with
rock. yes, perhaps my sentence structure was unclear but the "sometimes jazz thrown in" comment referred to prog, not fusion. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org